ANTIDOTS FOR CRITICISMS AND DISQUALIFICATION

Attend constantly to the disqualifying comments for being opposed to their criteria, desires or way to proceed, apart from not modifying what they would like, the only thing it involves is polluting the environment with what is categorized as bad language. Attack, criticize the system, because the prevailing context displeases them, without alternative proposals aimed at improving the existed one, it is also a sign  of futility by not providing constructivism to insist on negative expressions.                                                 To all these warriors of words, do they believe that the strategy will revert to a verifiable gain ? According to the seeds will be the fruits, and if they are bitter so will the ripening be. Wanting to change what can´t be done at the moment ¿ will the brillant idea or pouring bile pave the way to what you want ?                   In front a sterile attitude because it is unproductive, the anditot are constructive answers and effcient management. In front of silly words deaf ears. To counter stupidity, clear discernment and perspective view.                                                                                                                                                                 These perfect beings can explain to us the manual of good manners, that it seems they fail at the beginning, checking that the only thing they dominate are the exabruptes ? By the fact of insisting on contmept, in the effort to discredit, do they believethat it will bring them closer to the goal they would like to achieve ? Complain, use unpleasant tone and language, what it does is bore, tire the listener repeatedly over and over again nonsense words, which bring directly from an unaccepted frustration that they do not overcome because of their own ineptitude that betrays them as what they really are, incompetents. In their blindness they do not realize that the content of the speeches with assiduous expressions such as humiliation, indignation, non compliant with the law, divisive, that´s exactly what they come doing themselves as a hallmark of the house. A monumental projectation like a mirror unable to see how busy they are in searching for the most muddled terms possible.                                                                            What can we do with this group of exalted ? They are always right and the opponents curiously are always wrong. We can not have a dialogue with someone who is ready for viscerality when things don´t go as they want. Responsible in words and their incidence, and the actions and what it entails. Now, wanting to unload the accumulated impurities inside, they will hardly be held responsible of all the emptiness manifests that reveals an unsustanaible arguments. They don´t have to give an account because they are flawless, and the responsibility they leave it for those who keep making mistakes according to their judgments. All these prophets of a recent past and the current one, they disappear from the scene, and then no one remember them. The bad manners have not led them to success, rather to poverty, because the lack of intelligence inevitably leads to failure.