We change clothes, hairstyle, telephone, car, this does not cost too much. The question is : Despite all the changes, we polish, we realize about our handicaps, we feel better ? Everything that money can buy, the ephemeral, we can experience it with some satisfaction, but lasts only a moment. Once the novelty past, loses value when losing intensity.
As individuals, as a society, we are always engaged in conflict, when no working affaires, relationship, if not health the economy. It is our inner poverty which triggers continuosly problematic of all kinds, that generate huge inequalities, that having an immensely rich nature of we nourish, it turns out that many people cannot be feed, and much more live in precarious conditions.
Everyone wants to access to a quality as a whole, but the same actions do not lead in this direction.
We have politicians where are supposed to be at the service of the people, to be an ally, and it turns out that in reality are criminals camouflaged.
Like a climbs of unscrupulous speculators that can threaten the stability of the most elemental.
The gains made by the technology are very good for work, but once we turn to other areas, we continue with the same dilemmas since centuries ago. There has been little modified human character, therefore continues to maintain wild forms, abusive, destroying in order to gratify a few aberrant interests.
The external changes that may provide more evenness, the harmonious distribution of wealth, access to global development, we do not come neither by capitalist nor communist system. Only can be feasible for a change in consciousness, realising that if we cover the source from where all we drink, all will succumb, the hiper rich and the poor.
The ancestral selfishness has been the permanent obstacle to progress as humankind. Never has been resolved the problems because the force has prevailed over reason, the personal goods before the collective, and maintain these guideliness is never ending conflicts without solution.
We have valuable instruments in us, considering the free will to decide how to use them, which approaches gives, and observe the consequences of any claims. The particular experience and others previous precedent are relating to organize and deicde how to proceed best, where the responsibility is ours.
We have capabilities to build great feats, and also for large barbarities, where the difference to decant the balance in one sense or another can lead us to heaven or to hell in Earth, it depends on the approach and action that triggers. - Where do we want to bow ? So far, we have made toward the hell, if we want to do it toward the heaven first we have to transform ourselves, and there extend it into the external everyday.
Thursday 28 June 2012
Monday 18 June 2012
ABOUT THE TOLERANCE ( II )
Many people make mistakes and does not support any indication, reflection or suggestion to modify the behavior. The pride and ego are bad advisers, bearing in mind that the ultimate goal of any committed is approaching to the maximum correction.
It seems as only the police or relevant authorities could warn them because exert a socially accepted role to establish order. Teachers, parents, in our childhood, can be a part of this group, the rest has to silence the evidence not to offend these irresponsible.
It is a question to clarify incorrect forms of those that do not support get exposed for their misdeeds, while serious people and efficient suffer directly the consequences of careless procedures lacking in coherence, consideration and attention.
Many people don´t give importance to the idleness, to unworthy treatment, where unfortunately is a common fact that really nitpicking even the more fighter. They know that are not correct, but they wouldn´t listen to the powerlessness to change the prevailing.
People have become accustomed to not answer messages, letters, or pay at the appropiate time, to name just a few examples.We are witnessing a bleak picture in that multitude of aspects don´t work because of the mediocrity that does what it seems without taking into account the consequences or think about the neighbor.
We have to consent this accumulation of incompetence ? Not to react or take measures before the low quality of actions or inactions that harms a person who acts sleekely ?
We are in the personal assessments of each one before situations where some may consider annoying to make noises, give blows or other constraints, and others do not. In the face of uncertainty, a plus of consideration and respect for better living together is what has to been to seek.
It may not be that rude and inconsiderate will be upset if we put them in evidence to correct, and those that receive the sloppy ways have to hang in and not complain.
This attittude disable the concord, because proceed with negligence, wanting the impunity and do not claim to be amended, leads directly to the ruin.
Everything that breaks the harmony, becomes soiled, it goes against the natural balance, injures, hurts, it was not to be tolerated. Is the order who must prevail not the chaos, the dignity and not the contrary. If we agree that these individuals getting off unharmed, is to accept the degradation as inevitable.
Where, when and how must begin and end the tolerance ?
It seems as only the police or relevant authorities could warn them because exert a socially accepted role to establish order. Teachers, parents, in our childhood, can be a part of this group, the rest has to silence the evidence not to offend these irresponsible.
It is a question to clarify incorrect forms of those that do not support get exposed for their misdeeds, while serious people and efficient suffer directly the consequences of careless procedures lacking in coherence, consideration and attention.
Many people don´t give importance to the idleness, to unworthy treatment, where unfortunately is a common fact that really nitpicking even the more fighter. They know that are not correct, but they wouldn´t listen to the powerlessness to change the prevailing.
People have become accustomed to not answer messages, letters, or pay at the appropiate time, to name just a few examples.We are witnessing a bleak picture in that multitude of aspects don´t work because of the mediocrity that does what it seems without taking into account the consequences or think about the neighbor.
We have to consent this accumulation of incompetence ? Not to react or take measures before the low quality of actions or inactions that harms a person who acts sleekely ?
We are in the personal assessments of each one before situations where some may consider annoying to make noises, give blows or other constraints, and others do not. In the face of uncertainty, a plus of consideration and respect for better living together is what has to been to seek.
It may not be that rude and inconsiderate will be upset if we put them in evidence to correct, and those that receive the sloppy ways have to hang in and not complain.
This attittude disable the concord, because proceed with negligence, wanting the impunity and do not claim to be amended, leads directly to the ruin.
Everything that breaks the harmony, becomes soiled, it goes against the natural balance, injures, hurts, it was not to be tolerated. Is the order who must prevail not the chaos, the dignity and not the contrary. If we agree that these individuals getting off unharmed, is to accept the degradation as inevitable.
Where, when and how must begin and end the tolerance ?
Friday 8 June 2012
ABOUT THE TOLERANCE ( I )
When we hear or see written "tolerance" evil, because behind the word there is someone who has not acted with enough correction.
These that go preaching tolerance on behalf of a magnanimity, of a capacity for empathy, to minimize errors, in part is good and in part is bad. It is good that we are all exposed to not always be spotless and has not been crucifiy anyone if it passes, and it is bad when the laxity lowers the level of demand losing quality.
In reality the universe does not accept the tolerance, and you only need look at the closest to us. If we fail an exam we have to do it again if there are opportunities to do so. If we break the law receive a punishment in the form of a fine or imprisonment according to the case.
We are subject to cause and effect. According to the cause will be the effect. We can deviate from the path, but we must bear the consequences in the form of dangers, deterioration and discomfort. It is worth not to stick to the rules intended to proceed with righteousness ?
Is therefore because whatever we do we will collect what it planted. If we have acted properly we will have no problems and we will be able to view a few fruits for the work done. If we wanted to transgress the laws of nature that are supported in harmony, we will have complications, difficulties will arise, and instead of fruit we will have losses.
We have to be condescending with who is at the beginning of a new learning, first need an accurate shooting of instruction and practice, and those not dominate at the beginning, may be done at the end of the time. However, in the process of initial disregard to the later knowledge, there has to be demand because if not we will not make any headway.
The tolerance that emerged from the understanding has to be on time and with a foundation behind it which hold, otherwise would be to rewarding the offender, leaving the way to do what he want without consequences.
The right word in according to which situations taking into account the different levels of evolution and cultural is " accept ". Accept that there are differences, that the powers are not the same for all, that the degree of intelligence and sensitivity determines the attitude, and the wisest is who can understand who it is less, that each person is free to think as they want, but when it comes to acting with the incidence of our acts, we have to stick to a few precepts for the rule of civility.
These that go preaching tolerance on behalf of a magnanimity, of a capacity for empathy, to minimize errors, in part is good and in part is bad. It is good that we are all exposed to not always be spotless and has not been crucifiy anyone if it passes, and it is bad when the laxity lowers the level of demand losing quality.
In reality the universe does not accept the tolerance, and you only need look at the closest to us. If we fail an exam we have to do it again if there are opportunities to do so. If we break the law receive a punishment in the form of a fine or imprisonment according to the case.
We are subject to cause and effect. According to the cause will be the effect. We can deviate from the path, but we must bear the consequences in the form of dangers, deterioration and discomfort. It is worth not to stick to the rules intended to proceed with righteousness ?
Is therefore because whatever we do we will collect what it planted. If we have acted properly we will have no problems and we will be able to view a few fruits for the work done. If we wanted to transgress the laws of nature that are supported in harmony, we will have complications, difficulties will arise, and instead of fruit we will have losses.
We have to be condescending with who is at the beginning of a new learning, first need an accurate shooting of instruction and practice, and those not dominate at the beginning, may be done at the end of the time. However, in the process of initial disregard to the later knowledge, there has to be demand because if not we will not make any headway.
The tolerance that emerged from the understanding has to be on time and with a foundation behind it which hold, otherwise would be to rewarding the offender, leaving the way to do what he want without consequences.
The right word in according to which situations taking into account the different levels of evolution and cultural is " accept ". Accept that there are differences, that the powers are not the same for all, that the degree of intelligence and sensitivity determines the attitude, and the wisest is who can understand who it is less, that each person is free to think as they want, but when it comes to acting with the incidence of our acts, we have to stick to a few precepts for the rule of civility.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)