THE FORMS OF REACTION : IMPROVE OR WORSEN

How we do react to a situation ? It will depend on the magnitude, the possible implication, the value given to the context, the capacity for analysis, impartiality, of ideological criteria, of what is significant or important to us. We can be reactive or proactive. If the emphasis is on what annoys. what displeases we will not be able to decipher the underlying message and the opportunity of the experience.. If we observe with perspective with a view of the whole, we can access to an scenario that can offer unforeseen possibilities more favorable than the current situation.                                                                                    We react with calm or exalted ? Rationallly or for emotions ? Depending on what we decide, development will go in one direction or another, and we approach to an improve or to the worsening.                              The same topic arouses defenders and detractors. How is it possible this divergence ? The difference lies in the concepts. The individual idiosyncrasy driven by ideals which are given values, With a cultural influence and awareness that allows us to be equanimous and broad minded.                                                What are the arguments to believe that certain conditions improve or worsen ? Are they able to expose pros and cons from impartiality ? Can someone vehement and irrational elucidate clearly on what is appropiate or not, what is convenient or not ? From subjectivity must be objective.                                    How can we defend the perpetuation of static postures for centuries and centuries when the vital rythm constantly pushes forward ? Preserving a cracked foundation really lead to an ideal situation ? What is the real reason for the fear of change ?Why don´t they want to face challenges that lead to more satisfactory conditions ? We have free will that depends on knowledge to decide in one direction or another. The more primary and reactionary, more tendency to get worse by one´s own negligent expressions. The improvement of a context comes from a clear and broad discernment, in the environment and relevant resources to specify it.                                                                                                                                     Every day dilemmas arise where we can improve or worsen. If the passions and incongruities prevail, it can not be decisive. Improve requires a compendium of skills and good manners, accompanied by a precise analysis, equanimity and whole approach.

HUMANITY AND THE ORCHESTRA OF TITANIC

In which humanity resembles the orchestraa of titanic ? In which both are embarked on adventure with the intention of experiencing rewarding moments, but the appearance of the unexpected creates problems which ultimately lead to a disastrous situation despite the efforts to avoid it.                                               Did it make sense and logic to play while the ship was sinking ? It is logical for human action to degrade the environment in search of interests, warned that it must proceed in a diametrically different way ? What is the use of excessive enrichement that should bring more quality if dangers beset on multiple fronts ?      If we aim for a goal and the result is the opposite, means that the approach and execution is not the appropiate.                                                                                                                                                        The orchestra of titanic thought of the passangers, his attitude was altruistic, however, humanity, pushed by the own interests, does not harmonize the personal with the social, which is the cause of problems.       Immersed in banality, self centered in particular desires, we have a great ignorance of the optimal guidelines that we should adopt for a better life with more possibilities than the usuals. And sure that very few people know the exemple shown in the volume VIII of the Zohar section Shemot 2 page 8. Says so : when we choose to walk the path of spirituality, our moments of affliction and sadness they are mercifully brief.  However, if we allow ourselves self centered desires, then the suffering is intensified and prolonged. This intensified suffering and prolonged it is observed in multiple fronts and ways. Chaos and destruction derive from the darkness, they are the consequence of clumsy actions and erroneous intention, because it is light that brings abundance, peace, harmony and well being.                                                     The spiritual precepts show that nothing happens that has nothing to do with our correction. Therefore we shoul ask ourselves : Why do we have to experience these degradations ? How we will see the message hidden in the event to understandand  the possibility of amendment ? Bad affaire with the prevailing level, the generalized unconsciousness and the strictly mundane goals. Go playing impotent while the ship is sinking.