TO FIT OR NOT FIT

The proper functioning of what surround us it´s a matter of fit. Several individualities with the respective singularities and contributions, need the support of other individuals, where the resources and shortcomings of each other to carry out exchanges that supply the desired, if they fit together, the purpose of the established links is achieved. To fit is from duality, 1+1. Externalization pushes us to be linked by dependencies, and in a constant offers and demand on a personal and commercial level the ideal coupling must occur in each context. Surrounded by animated and inanimated objects, of people and animals, all have a function and benefits, trying to relate to us in a timely manner for profit and harmony. Subject and object conveniently coupled is the milestone to pursue at all times. Between sender and receiver, give and receive, there must be a nexus that allow the proper connection, because the bonds pursue some kind of fit; otherwise the links are useless. We fit with others through tastes, ideals,specific affinites, feelings, goals. If it is the opposite we will not be able to fit. Tastes, ideas, different trends, it will be difficult to fit if there is no point to unclog it. We can fit by equality or similarity, and also by differences when each party provides what the other needs as a complement. We feel comfortable with who we fit into one or more points according to our idiosyncrasy, and especially the way we think and value what we have. And on the opposite side when others differ discomfort immediately arises. This is due to the egoic forms of reaction. We may dislike it and disagree with the exposures and/or manners of someone, but the opportunities to extract messages and profit it can come from both what is pleasing and unpleasant to us. The fit on an epoch with friendhips and couples, when the paths diverge, proximity becomes distance, and passes to the non fit, indicating that the fit must be continuosly monitored. In one way or another we all look for the right way to adjust us, because discord is what does not adjust, and therefore does not serve. Reach an agreement between the parties that intervenes, know how to behave, make a fair deal, these and other factors they must lead to fit , because if we are not skilled by proceeding properly, the result will lead to non fit.

DIALECTICAL BOREDOM

Much ignoraance and little knowledge is the prominent tonic. The majority interests are personal and material. Vision and focus arise from limitation and are superficial. In the face of this evidence, what communication can emerge ? Reiterative arguments, always wandering in routine matters, what final profit are we able to extract ? Where everyone is, interests, the concerns, certain inclinations, the ability to understand, values, is what we show in conversations, and if we stopped at one point and didn´t move, the only thing we do and keep doing is going around to the same subjects that do not contribute novelties nor a broader perspective to break inertia. In an encounter catching up requires a few minutes, the posterior extension with insubstantial banalities is to add filling comments and empty the backgrounbd chatter of content. We can only give what we have, and listening everyday a lot of linked words to say nothing neither provide reflections nor useful learning, it simply reveals the very long pending path of development that is indispensable to realize to consider ourselves evolutinarily advanced. Global limitation keeps us in this society of constant conflicts with the consequent relationship problems. The years go by and the utensils of daily use change, more comfortables, with more benefits, and instead of applying it as well in our behavior improving the precise areas, we continue with the multiple expressions that lead to discord. As a result of not knowing how to behave, the retort are demonstrations, strikes, demands. It has ever been able to succeed if it was unsustanaible to preserve the existing, without a force to impose, succumbing to the minority of power but with the executing force. As well as useless repetitive speeches, the same form of vindication in actions which mantain the prevailing immobility, should think about a change of strategy, a different approach that overflow the status quo, because only with words and some threat, is not enough to demolish the armored wall of those who govern, and to make this possible is necessary to increase individual and collective wisdom, on the contrary, perpetuation of dialectical and also everyday boredom.