SMALL GAINS, LARGE LOSSES

What we want to gain / to obtain ? We pursue a noble or innoble purpose ? The focus is only thinking of the benefit itself or to generate balanced exchanges ? With an impatient projection in the short term, or a gradual solidity pointing to the long term ?

What we want and how tell us our character. Achieve new goals is the dynamizing engine, but we need to know what and why, having to guard for the demands both material and spiritual.

We must ask : Which are the most important gains?  What do you really value to get involved with ? The considered relevant if we get it will report an improvement in some sense ? Will we move forward in some area ?

At every moment we have what we need, if we want more, if we notice shortcomings ¿ Does the voice come from some worldly selfish desires, or of the inner voice that yearns expand the virtues as being ? What we can gain now quickly with unethical maneuvers, becoming loss in time view ¿ is really worth a momentous enjoyment and a long dissatisfaction with discomfort and tension in the way ?

The excess, the abuse, with an incorrect proceding generator of short circuits, satisfies temporarily and disconnects from the abundance to end poverty. The lack of initial clarity in the purpose and in the process with the subsequent consequences, ends up converting the desired welfare in discomfort, and the supposed gain in loss.

If the achieved is with illicit means, taking advantage of others, creating seeds of discord, perhaps the instinctive inferior nature will be satisfied, but in the way we will lose the virtues, deep wound will occur, and the potential light to generate splendor in our lifes it will end up empty for being driven from the dark.

It is wothwhile to move away from eternal value pursuing ephimeral values that sooner or later will dilute ? Sacrifice the highest by the lowest ?

Where we intend to project interests, towards what uphold us or towards a degradation for what has been done and caused ?

We must desire to win for improve the external conditions from the internal improvement, From the abstraction to the concretion to engage body and soul in a way of constant progress.

THE CONCEPT OF HAPPINESS

How can the concept of happiness be defined ? Probably the thing that can merge connecting the inside and outside with a sensation of welfare.

Everyone follows the happiness so it´s supposed to provide pleasantly through some facts, of experienced ones.

Each one is different, and therefore the conceived as happiness by someone it will not be for another. Many factors come into play, from personal evolution and goals, until the means of action, circumstances and execution possibilities.

The imagined as a source of enjoyment, once experienced can be a disappointment, a kind of balloon that is deflated by placing expectations on oscillating external factors.

What is to be happy ? Why ? What are the codes that incline in this regard ? What do we have to notice to make this statement ? How can be happy if what surrounds us constantly hangs from a thread ? What can do happy ? Have brilliant ideas ? The result of certain actions ? What difference of parameters is there between the materialist and some with spiritual restlessness ? What is the difference between happiness and joy, satisfaction and content ?

The " sensation " of happiness must be combined the one that flows from us with the field where we are located. A combination of thought and feeling with an emotional component that grants value to certain characteristics considered important or significant for us.

Why someone is happy and why someone not ? For the capacity or the incapacity to cling to the surrounding environment.

Because of being rich must be happy ? No. Because of being poor must be unhappy ? No. The fact to have only means greater possibilities to get resources and choice. What we means by happiness is a rewarding sensation product of a combination of factors that vibrate with our kindness.

We can not be happy if we are selfish, if we are indifferent to the suffering of other people or animals, if we don´t know to treat correctly the neighbour. The longed for happiness only can come from sharing, giving and serve, to worry sincerely for others. The ability to create union nexus to facilitate the best of each one through intelligence and sensitivity.

For more different than others, this must be the way.

THE CRITICISM ( II )

The criticism is useless if there is not a transformation and improvement.We can express disagreements, that they´ll leave all the same if there is not subsequent action with the will to straighten the dissonances. 

In front of two antagonistic positions criticizing each other. who is well routed ? The one who looks for the final harmony with a focus and overall incidence.

Of everything that we got to criticize, what is true and what is false, what is exaggerated and what does not, what is real and what is imaginary ? Too lightly think of anything from a very limited perspective, believing that we know enough of the subject when in fact is much more the ignorant than the well known damaging much of the comments, and finally undermining the background  by the forms.

If we don´t see the bigger picture how can we have the boldness to crticize a small portion of a context that escapes to our perception and understanding ? What happens individually and collectively has a goal, is a part of a chained plot to push up to the higher level in our expressions.

We can discover the origin, the cause of a crisis, in the indidual and social, but the fact of criticize the one that generate chaos, frustration and tension it does not help to solve the dilemma that puts us to the test forcing us out of comfort for the uncomfortable.

Mistake,stumble several times, is part of the learning. When we are not sufficiently accurate we must stop, observe where is the error, correct and prepare to keep climbing new steps.

We are not here to satisfy continually the ego desires. Our function is turn us into righteous, and this needs to be replaced the judgment with the component of implicit criticism in mercy, but only will be possible increasing the wisdom that allows to see clearly injecting the essential sensitivity doses towards others and their circumstances.

When harmony rests inside is manifested outside, this is what must be done at any time and there is no longer any criticism because we are only pending to do the right in every moment.

THE CRITICISM ( I )

What drives to criticize ?  The eagerness of perfection. ¿ How can we know what is appropriate in each case taking into account our shortcomings, ignorance and imperfections ? In the background  most of times, it is because others say or do what we do not like from our ideal perspective according to the idiosyncrasy forged over the years.

There are occasions where criticism has a foundation for its evidence, but in these cases it should be more an observation, a reflection, to correct what damages.

How is possible that in front of the same fact someone criticize and others defend it ? Who is right ? If one of the parties expose irrefutable arguments, how can the other misrepresent the happened before the evidence ?

Everyone criticizes and everyone has been criticized. We are sure that we have the possession of the truth, but this is an ego product. To know where the corect or incorrect one lies requires a consciousness in constant expansion, to instruct spiritually, do not let yourself be affected emotionally to preserve the equanimity, and leave personal interests out of context to issue the fair verdict.

Criticism is a judgment, fixing ourselves in a small portion. We don´t know what is the hidden trigger of why are occurring certain facts, why have been pronounced certain words or performed actions and the echo caused.

If at all times it happens what must happen, which seems incorrect from a superficial observation and lack of referents, it´s correct from subtlety.

If crticized in principle according to our beliefs, tastes and convictions, after a while it becomes a profit ¿ was it citicized or was it an opportunity ?

ACCUMULATING DAYS

We are acmulating days, where the important is not the quantity but the quality of these.

In the increase of add life ¿  we do this by acquiring virtues, improving habits, treat others correctly, set new plans for personal improvement ?

What are doing good during the day to be remembered, worth it ? We are wandering because there is no other remedy, or we have a concern that allow us to go beyond subsistence ?

How many of us know why is it here and now in this dimension, the cause of their presence and  the specific task to perforn ? How many between us made this question ? Why we want to live ? For what ?

We live conscious, semi-conscious or unconscious ? What motivates us to preserve our continuity here ? With what purpose ? Why the desire of many earthly years when close relationhips are a disaster in a great number, when we are unable to modify harmful ancestral behavior for us and those around us, when having the most information and access to knowledge we don´t know how to live healthy nor make a productive use of these potential resources ?

We improve the tools of everyday use, but we continue immersed in the discord. Before there was a kind of danger, and now there are others created by voracity and clumsy.

Why we want accumuilate days ?  To follow the same spiritual poverty ? To perpetuate the petty,selfishness, ignorance ?  To fight against each other in order to impose their own desires ? Or we want accumulate days to clarify the sense, the goal and the purpose of a transient existence where the more deep is beyond of our comprehension and limited consciousness of this physical world ?

NOT TO DO WHAT WE HAVE TO DO

Not to do what we have to do how many things we have to do ! Want to preserve the privileges obtained with bad manners damaging a large part of the population, generating considerable conflicts, where far from solving the problematic background it gets worse by shielding the established position with the means of indispensable force without the slightest sensibility or consideration, exercising power without ethics or moral, manipulating laws and what is convenient to perpetuate.

Only is good and valid the one that suits and interest to the stablishment, and if they are threatened don´t doubt to act with all despotism, lies and perversions, imaginable and unimaginable, turning what can be solved in sensible form and longing for justice, in a nightmare and permanent revulsion with the purpose of maintaining wicked interests.

Affairs that can be solved with dialogue, with respect, follow without finding an exit for years or decades because they are imposed over and over again the brutal forms that don´t have any consideration  using all means at their fingertips to preserve petrified conditions that are rotten from the root spreading increasingly to all areas.

These few dominators get dirty and dirty the population with primary approachess and the bestiality that show the words and actions.

Those who believes themselves great they are portrayed with their smallness, preventing the advancement of those who have progressive projects because in the society continues imposing the rudeness to the intelligence, the violence to the peace.

And so the time goes by, those who try to live like deads in perennial immobility, and those who want to move forward and they can not because again and again the aggressiveness and barbarism still prevails unfortunately paying all us the consequencees.

ALWAYS BETWEEN TWO PARTS

We find always between two parts. The one that begins and the one that ends. Between the action and the rest, silence and noise, day and night, give and receive. When we are in one side of the balance the other is not there, but is also a link between what is and goes giving way to a new situation. In fact everything is a link and there is no emptiness but a change. This indicate the transitory nature on one side, and the need to harmonize continuously so that wherever we meet during the day we are coupled in an appropriate way.

Do we know how to extract profit from each part ? When we start a project we are well enough ready to get a profit in a short or large term ? The end of a stage, a cicle, of a job, of a relationship, have they brought some kind of expansion and improvement ? The daily occupation is driving me wherever I am supposed I have to go there for my peculiarities, talents and purposees ? Or I simply try to survive without any other defined objective ?

The words, the conversations in which I participate, are edifying, inspiring, or it´s a simple talking to talk ? Is it better what I say or what I don´t say ?

We often do not know how to be comfortable neither in a side nor in the other if we have acquired before an inner tranquility that is accompanied by an uplifting project of personal and social implication. The dilemmas between what we do or not, what we take or let, what we want or what we reject, it submerges us in this going forward unavoidable but not satisfied and disconforme powerless to straaighten out the general context as we would like to being immersed in the immediate with a narrow margin of maneuver to reverse it.

We  will never develop the potential in full, why in the way the own shortcomings and those who cross in the way, they keep us in lethargy of not being awake as it would be necessary nor complete asleep. And so, if we don´t know to take advantage of what each part of the polarity offer, we will remain incomplete with the feeling of unsatisfctory void that accompanies us continuously.

MINIMUM ESSENCE

What is left of all experimented ? Whatever it is from everything preserves only a minimum essence.

Of the ingested food only the indispensable for good function remain, and the unserviceable is eliminated.

If we attend a conference, at the end will only remember some nuances, and after a few days it will still wane more.

Of the learned in a course for more dominion what we got to get, we will retain a portion, the rest will be forgotten along the way.

What do we keep in the memory of a trip ? For more than we liked it, finally only sparks of a landscape, a monument, a restaurant. Very little compared to everything seen.

Of a friendly encounter, of enriching debates, for more than in a moment we had them savored, a small fraction is what will remain if there is something left after one time.

What have we taken advantage really of the day ? What benefit we have obtained ?  It´s more the rage useless in banal occupations or in edifying actions ?

Nor do we take advantage of our potential nor of everything that is at our fingertips. Pursuing trivialities we are disconnected from the essence. Putting the secondary as the objective, on the way we lose the main thing.

Only the subtle is preserved of which we live, which is or can be useful. Also disagreable memories, and they are just keep to awaken consciousness and decipher the message to discover the subtlety.

Let´s misappress the valuable one as if it were not, hurrying in the indispensable one by the prevailing superficiality, and in the end everything will be diluted if we have not been able to feed and cultivate the essence.

WHAT DOES IT MAKE US BE HOW ARE WE ?

This question should be formulated by all us : What makes us be how we are ? Really what we show is what we really want ? Why think, feeling or act in a certain way ? Where has been forged and how the ideas, the feelings manifest as they do ?

We believe that we know us, but if we proceed moved by instincts, for low passions, for primary samples, really we are far from connecting to the internal essence deeper in us.

The immediate environment and personal desires, where all the approaches are minimized is not possible leave of a life of pure subsistence.

We don´t know why we are how we are and not  otherwise, at least the most who do not access to the knowledge that allow to decipher beyond the appearances. Everything has a reason, and if we don´t discover it we will act to the blinkers, with restricted capabilities, and therefore a minimum efficiency.

From where emerges the dictator, the authoritarian ? What pushes us to be cordial, comprehensible ? Why there are countries with high level of education, respect, civism ? Why are others where part of the population are rude, closed, aggressive, unable to progress ? To what obey these differences ? Where is the origin ? What is the trigger ?

Busy simply to keep the physical continuity, we never go deep into the why of the why, in the origin of the origin. We don´t even know nor do we want to, it seems that it only matter to go happening and such a day will be a year.

The human potential can be immens, but our manners, conformism, impotence to modify inertias, keep us permanently on the superficiality and great unconsciousness. And we are going through day to day without knowing where we are going and if truly the efforts they are rooted in the appropriate direction or is it simply an impetus forward between lignt and darkness at an outcome that depends in part of us and from anoher of the collective axis.

IRRESPONSIBILITY PROJECTIVE

In this society surrounded by immatures, one and the others accuse mutually of do this or that blasting the responsibility above.

We see diary incendiary politics that burning fires where interested, lying, manipulating and inventing stories of science fiction to generate a climate of tension that favor certain pretensions. And with an extreme cynicism say that are the others. Is like a thief who is caught with the money and the wallet at hand and says that they gotten a trap.

Go projecting what is said and what is being done transferring it to the adversary don´t can pass in any mode.

Perhaps the most unwary and who think like they, but the tactical aggression, scorn and disdain of those that are simply different is the evidence of who are behind a language and trench modes.

Each one is responsible of the pronouced words and actions carried out. You can not go all day saying that the other is an evil and I am a saint. That my arguments are valid and those who don´t fit these they should be eliminated anyway.

That I am the democratic one when I just repress, to coerce, to condition and forbid the dissent, and those that are open, respectful and shows an open mind it turns out they are criminals.

Entangle, cheat, distort, want to impose at all costs some skippers jumping the ethics, the moral and the most basic norms of civility, indicates the social typology supported by a mass that overthrows the tactic of confrontation.

In a healthy society ideas are being debated, the afraid is not present to face challenges, the differences are respected.

In a sick society there are abuses of power, ones have privileges and others are mistreated, you can deffend an idea but do not apply it if goes against the stablishment.

The cavernicola behavior perhaps make win votes in the short term, but in the long run the background conflicts only can be solved with wisdom, equanimity and eagerness of justice. Whatever that is not so is impose the force brute over the intelligence.