Sunday, 25 October 2026

THE THREE CATEGORY OF PEOPLE

The three category of people relates to the level of consciousness, perception and social conception, in accordance with one´s respective developmental potential. The first category includes those who are content with existing laws; these are citizens who conform to prevailing rules and norms. The second category consist of those who are dissatisfied with the current state of affairs and wish for humanity to ascend to a higher level, these are the Initiated who have come  with the goal of helping humans awaken a consciousness that allows for an ascent to a plane characterized by greater justice and love. The third category comprises the destroyers, the anarchists, those who shatter harmony. Of those three categories, one respect the established order, while the other two seek to change it : one aims to replace it with a divine order, the other with a diabolical one.                                                                                                    We can observe these three categories in our environment based on how individuals think, how they present themselves, and what objectives or aspirations they hold. The largest group consists of those who conform to existing laws, mundane regulations established by local authorities, tax authorities or the government. They live within and form material concerns, and it never occurs to them to venture beyond the established scripts. The most harmful category comprises those driven by selfish personal desires that disrupt harmony, disturb the environment, and annoy or cause harm to others. There is a disconnect between what they want and the appropriateness of those desires, as their pursuit negatively impacts their surroundings and the people affected by them.                                                                                                The category of the discontented, comprising not only those troubled by the daily dysfunctions found in any sphere of life consists of individuals who yearn for a life of meaning, purpose and fulfillment that trascends mere subsistence. Achieving this requires venturing further, reconizing the connections and links between the visible and the invisible, the dense and the subtle. It is an immense undertaking, one that must be desired with all one´s might, and it is a path only a few are willing to tread, for it demands the total engagement of one´s entire being, in every moment and forever.

Sunday, 11 October 2026

IN SEARCH OF SENSIBLENESS

Good sense must be expressed in three ways : in what we say, in what we feel, and what we do.It is shaped by cultural values; actions that are punishable or carry potentially harmful in one place may be of no consequence in another, The challenge lies in finding the right approach. Synonymous for good sense includes prudence, moderation and seriousness. Behaving in accordance with these qualities demonstrates sensibleness and helps uphold what is considered good conduct.                                                                  Sensibleness implies clarity and the weighing of the minimums or maximums of what we desire or intend. It means avoiding excess, searching correction. The antonyms of sensibleness are foolishness, stupidity, absurdity and madness. Thus when someone tell you " be good sense " they are urging you to embody these qualities.                                                                                                                                                  Sensibleness is a blend of harmony and balance; its absence leads to discord bringing with it dangers and detrimental consequences depending on the situation. In a social context fraught  with conflicts and problems, we must ask ourselves why we fail to see the consequences of certain approaches and objectives, ones that plunge us into a state of constant threat, driven by one cause or another.                      Where is the good sense of those who disturb the peace ? Where is the good sense of leaders whose decisions make things worse rather than better ? Where is the good sense of speculators and major corporations that drag a significant portion of the population into poverty ? If we have been endowed with intelligence, how is it possible not to distinguish the pros and cons of past and present actions, as well as the factors that trigger them.