CRIMES ARE ERRONEOUS DESIRE OF EGO

Committing a crime means transgressing laws aimed at restoring order and justice to avoid chaos. Everything that surrounds us is subject to laws so that haramony prevails, and if they violate the discord breaks this harmony.                                                                                                                                         We all have what need at every moment. To pretend more is to say that there is a mistake in the individual supervision assigned to each. Is a desire that arises from ignorance believing in certain rights to achieve gratifications. Nothing further from the truth, because achieving goals depends on merits. Want things of someone´s else using coercive methods, assaulting, harming or damaging values or physical integrity, is one of the most despicable acts which denote lowliness by breaking basic rules of coexistence. Starting with misappropiation and continuing with disrespect and disturbance of peace. In search of a mean to have which deteriorates the subject losing various virtues along the way more valuable than any booty achieved by force to satiate some instincts.                                                                                                                   A punishable characteristic is that the criminal seeks personal gain at the expense of another´s loss. ¿ Can there be an action more miserable than this ? The ultimate exponent of selfishness and inconsideration, instigator of negativity by what entails the desire, action and the result.                                                       What do you want to get ? Satisfy a primal desire. Can be sex, money, desire for dominance, revenge. What these individuals don´t understand or don´t know is that if you don´t have what you want, it is because it´s not theirs, because if were the opposite one way or another it would get to them.                      It is said that a spirit of madness is introduced into the person that drives him to commit crime. And really is so, because it doesn´t just break several laws, but the subsequent toll to pay is much greater that the supposed gain. It does not even endanger the loss of freedom, fines or other dispositions, it is the debt to repair with the people, means and the environment that has harmed, apart from the accumulated karma to be paid in the form and time we don´t know when it will be presented.

THE MINIMUM CONTRIBUTION OF EACH ONE THAT ALLOWS TO LIVE

Within the immense universe of which we only know  a tiny part, we are surrounded by various kingdoms with their evolution and contribution. Each one has a function that participates in the exchange for retroactive feeding. How the peculiarities and benefits of each species have been forged is a mistery like many others, but looking into an unknown immensity, we see that our shortcomings and dependencies which we can  not cover individually, we get them thanks to everyone´s contribution.                                 Personally we are only able to offer minuscule donations, because the rest depends of multiple connections that nurture us in obtaining resources. To mantain ourselves physically and act we can only do it for ourselves, but breathe, eat and drink we get it by the environment. We do the minimum effort, because the maximum in our continuity it comes from outside.                                                                                         We are like a drop of water in the middle of an ocean, showing that our pretensions of greatness are a sample of ignorance and unconsciousness to inflate the ego. We should realize what we do, what we want, and when drives, realizing how little we are able to achieve going after banalities while the substance of what will have to look for escapes us.                                                                                                              Our insignificance in the immensity is showing in our incapacity to evolve gradually. Investment time in task empty of content we don´t expand knowledge, preventing improvement in the needed areas. And so accumulate days that has the goal to replace the prosaic with the refined, it does not even enter the plans of the majority. We are contributing to maintaining the presence, but is only the external part.                         The purpose is the qualitive transformation using the resources and the executive capacity that reveals the content the efforts of our peculiarity and function among the rest of the various contributors, where everyone plays their role and service whether we see or not.

ATTRACTION OR REPULSION

The attraction or repulsion it´s a matter of wavelength. Where we tune in, where we vibrate, where we agree, will generate attraction, And on the opposite side it will show us repulsion.                                       The senses transmit information to us according to our idyosincrasies. It´s all about tastes and values. What we like has a value, and what we dislike does not. We want to get closer to what makes us feel good, and away from what does not freeze, what irritates.                                                                                        The similar attracts the similar and the different separate. We need to stay with people with whom we understand each other, be able to collaborate with each other, That´s why we come together for affinities. ¿ How can we relate to any perspective if the ideals are opposites, different objectives and a conflicting code of values ? The evolutionary level, the cultural scope, the family heritage they influence the concepts we have forged about what surround us. Diversity menas that there are criteria and tendencies of all kinds, and so that which is highly valued and pleasant by some, it is unpleasant and worthless to others. ¿Some are right and others not ? Connections lean us in one direction, and development and results must be seen with the possible benefits or losses to realize where each one is headed and what he may find sooner or later.                                                                                                                                                                 We must know how to observe to realize the pros and cons of what attracts. Temptations assiduously physical and / or materials can look captivating, but is necessary broaden horizons and seeing the full picture and possible outcomes.                                                                                                                       Both what attracts and what is rejected are indicated to us by the senses. What we see, feel, touch, smell and tastes, and our singularity they will lean in one side or another. We are destined to relate with the people according to our evolution in each section of the different processes. Who is very different we will no longer know him, because the important thing is the utility.                                                                      We must approach to what revitalizes and offers opportunities, and reject the opposite sense. Is very easy make the elections because we have very internalized what fit us and what diverges.

IMMOBILITY DUE TO FEAR, COMFORT OR PRIVILEGE

If we are immersed in a world set up to move forward, why certain people in which areas immobility is sought ? Links are inevitable. From a previous action to a later one, the chain is constant, and no one escapes to this framework. Every day is similar but none identical, then ¿ from which arises the desire to perpetuate situations for fear or supposed losses, to enjoy a comfort or maintain certain privileges ? We are permanently debating between two fronts. Facing the unknown with what we know to go looking for what you don´t have. A part of certainty  and a foundation. and one part of uncertainty and empty. The ignorance of what can happen it makes us cling to the experienced and usual because we know how to proceed.                                                                                                                                                            The spiritual precepts tell us that everything is for the best and we must have certainty. If we know how to observe, we will check on an individual level. Events that seemed harmful at the time have led us to a more optimal situation. In the collective aspect it cost much more due to the dynamic of crisis and chaos that always accompanies us.                                                                                                                            Why we want to hold on to relationships that are empty of content, boring, without enthusiasm or a purpose of growth ? why don´t we look to find a job that allows us to cover indispensable resources ? Why do we settle for a simple generalization in the different usual areas if the stranding prevails in more of a front ? Maintaning privileges often at the expenses of others for selfish material desires which are satisfying to have but prevent improvements as a being.                                                                                                      What do we gain and what do we lose with immobility ? We want to cover the file and make it light by wasting opportunities to expand us by imaginary fears of thought ? Or we want to establish generalized satisfaction through efforts, time and patience with the relevant benefits at the right time ?                         What is immutable are the foundations from which the basic intentions spring expressed in eternal virtues with the purpose of stablishing a state of continuous well being and harmony.

INDULGENCE AND DEMAND

Demand is squeeze, indulgence is loosen up. Demand is rigor, indulgence is clemency. Demand is ambition  to do more  and better. Indulgence is lower possibilities by indolence for lack of enthusiasm opting for inaction. Do we have to be demanding ? If we want quality provinding us with more optimal benefits with increment of resources, is indispensable. Demand is to maintain or raise the level. The action has a purpose aimed at a profit, and the result will tell us.                                                                              The idyosincrasy and aptitudes of each one raise or lower the bar with respect to the claims of what we pursue. Giving more or less importance to the objectives will determine the involvement and intensity. To preserve and continue to advance in the field that entails a demand of attention, specific actions and have the appropiate instruments. It´s all a matter of measurements. Demand is to add up, to overcome, and according to the context and the person it can end up being counterproductive. Indulgence tends to subtract by inaction or indulge in excesses, but it can be useful in specific situations to relax.                       If we want more we must do more, but more is not always synonimous of more satisfaction. Win in certain respects at the cost of losing in others, does not report well being. Is here where we have to know what the priorities are so they end up flowing.                                                                                               There are those who are demanding towards others and indulgent towards oneself. The good posture is show understanding and benevolence, and demand when it is precise.                                                           There are moments to be demand and others to be indulgent. Harmony lies in make the relevant choice in every situation, and this it depends on the perspective of equanimity and knowing how to value the presents factors that enter in scene in each case.

HURTFUL ACTS ARE NOT ERASED

Nothing is casual, everything has a reason, and although we do not see the motive of the experienced, it obeys some purpose that we may or not discover. Every cause will have its effect, and the trigger can backfire on us to a recent or remote past about certain behaviors. Hurtful words, dishonest actions, swindlers, aggressions, mistreats, they are for reflection and show us the ideal forms to proceed instead of discomfort with well being.                                                                                                                              Even if we see that they are signs, warnings, messages of learning, the imprint generated in us will remain impregnated in the more deep as indelible stains. The words are not carried away by the wind, they are remembered, they are perpetuated. The intensity of the wound due to incorrect behaviors can be minimized, but the memory is mantained and the loss of quality, trust and closeness that we had is fading away. We must think very well what we want to say or what we want to do for the later consequences. Everything counts, and once it has been externalized there is no going back and it is recorded with the impact it has left.                                                                                                                                               The egoistic and insensitive forms are the origin of all indecisiveness coming from actions or words. When someone must ask for forgiveness it is the recognition of an error, and the best thing is to try not to have to get here. We say we forgive the offender, but the fact leaves a lasting memory and it remains as a stain on the file and a deterioration in the relationship according to the magnitude of the fact and the result. Disappointments accumulate over the years, when it is not one´s are others, When they are not close relations, others are, and in the end, the intensity and the enjoyment is losing in the way.

SEE OBJECTIVELY OR WHAT I WANT TO SEE

We all want to see according to our desires and what is considered important or valuable. Know how to observe, realize what is around, requires identification. What we see in the environment is what propel us in our behavior. Received messages can come in different ways. Subtle or obvious warnings indicating disadvantages if we do according to what. Driven by selfish desires and harmful actions, despite knowing it to a greater or lessen extent, will result in worse consequences than the possible gain or satisfaction that has pushed to execute what was done previously.                                                                                           We must awaken within us the strenght to perceive the difference between the good and the negative and make the right choice. Distinguish what pushes up or down, which bring forth the good manners or the tension of the bad manners of discordant pretensions.                                                                                    Civilization remains in chaos because narrow vision driven by personal interests prevail without realizing the impact on a large scale. The interaction between the individual and the collective is constant and interdependent, and if the approaches are individualistic it is because of our vital continuity depend exclusively on us.                                                                                                                                            Darkness is ignorance, light is knowledge. To more vision more chances to proceed correctly. To more darkness more possibilities to be wrong. Before acting we have to decide how to give vent to ideas or goals. Once underway affecting the environment or other people the outcome depends on various uncontrollable factors.                                                                                                                                     Do we see objectively with respect to ourselves or the vision toward others ? Do we know how to see with perspective and equanimity ? We only focus on what interests us ? Do we ignore what we dislike and pretend it doesn´t exist ? All the problems derive from the non coupling between the transmitting part and the receiving part, that in relationships we exercise both functions. This indicates that we must know what we want, why and what is the ideal form to achieve this by thinking about the final correction in the result. What we want to see or would like does it have a benign or malignant connotation ? Will it generate well being or discomfort ? For the benefit of one party and the detriment of another ?                                          The darkened vision comes from wrong goals driven by the desires of the ego who only see what he wants to see. See clearly it is a sign of greater civilization to locate the parts and the whole in search of justice, not motivated by personal interests.                                                                                                     Short term gains and long term losses, or prudence and rectitude to obtain the appropiate agreement to the merit made. Everything will depend on the vision and attitude adopted.

STERILE CRITICISM OR CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM

What is the purpose of criticism ? Improve the existing one. Before listing what we think is incorrect, we must be sure that whoever we address the criticism will be receptive and will want modify epressions if is appropiate. The foundations of criticism require the confluence of three points. It must be good in its purpose. It must be useful, i. e. applicative. And it must be necessary, for the benefit of the aforementioned and the impact on third parties.                                                                                                                       What drives us to criticize is the correct perception or not of the observer, that he is not acting as he should according to what is considered correct. The critic in question have the full picture at your disposal to judge with equanimity ? Are the ratings in line with your tastes and interests ? Is the criticism thinking of him or the criticized ? What is wrong ? Can it be proven that this is really the case ? What don´t like ? Does the criticism affirm with verifiable arguments or is it an opinion ? The statement must provide evidence to be credible and fulfill the function of amendment. If is an opinion according to particular ideas and values, is subjective, and if the fund can not be improved, does not exercise the objective.                    The critic show displeasure for what really want and it doen´t happen. The speech must be reformulated to achieve the true purpose that is resolve the damaged or certain behaviors. The critic want to correct, optimize, in order to search perfection. However, if not influence or modify the intended it is of no use and becomes sterile.                                                                                                                                                 The critic must lead by example.To be heard and believable he must set an example. The critic always it must be founded in the positivity after observe and reflect that facilitates a favorable change.                       To see the negative is very easy, especially in a society in search of comfort and little responsibility, and if we add selfishness to it, the percentage of error in behavior is very high.                                                     We aim the bad, we see the bad, we show the bad. Who expresses himself like this can prove that he is impeccable ? Insisting on darkness is due to the inability to introduce more light in us. The sun always shines and is present, if we don´t see it is because with our negativity we have been putting up curtains that prevent us from seeing it.

THE TRAPS OF AFFECTION ( II )

If the bond of a persistent couple does not facilitate bring out the best, is necessary to rethink the meaning of the relationship and where it leads. What motivates to want the presence of someone daily ? The desired or supposed experience with someone´s company, in what proportion is it fulfilled ? Give up time, space, resources, for what purpose we do it ? What do we want couples for and to do what ? Having children is a social act because they affect society in multiple aspects. Who thinks about this apart for the responsibility of potential parents in collective incidence ?                                                                                                   We wish and we want to believe that through someone we like due to some characteristics, we will experience feelings of well being, but these only are portions of a whole. We must be able to observe the pros and cons widely for an approach or distance, and the scale will decide whether or not if the relationship is viable. Sharing everyday life limits and conditions only for a few hours, taking into account the time devoted to work and sleep. If the person in question is not really enchanting for various virtues, Is it worth mortgaging yourself for someone´s company if there is no common task of sustained growth ? The theoretical learning and teaching that the exchange has to offer can it be produced taking into account the prevailing worldliness and superficiality ?                                                                                                 The trap of affects is give priority on the emotional side which make vulnerable in feelings, and these need the guidance of the intellect to discern between the ideal and the disadvantage.                                          To feel good, being with someone is not synonymous of better. Boredom is caused by repetitiveness, the predictability and stagnation. We sacrifice the silence, peace, and quietness which are priceless goods that can not be brought to us from outside, for an hourly company without a defined goal nor individual or common progress.                                                                                                                                             Partner, children, they bring out the best in us or are part of our interests with any background that has little altruism ? Expressing and receiving affection is the best feeling to experience, but we must know how. And if it costs so much to have rewarding relationships is due to unfocused approaches of the ego and its pretensions. Partner and children are the biggest challenge due to proximity and involvement. Be prepared and able for the differences to converge for the common good is the most difficult task, hence the constant problem of finding the appropiate terms and expressions.

THE TRAPS OF AFFECTION ( I )

We are the 100% of time with us, and the presence or company of others is only in a while. This indicates that relationships are occasional, for this reason we must know why we want it or need it.                           What can a certain person contribute that has more value than we can execute on our own ? Where we don´t reach we require the contribution of others to achieve a purpose. Interactions are essential to cover deficiencies, and this tend to be short, is an approach and distance according to fund interests. Family are fundamental in the early years, however, as we acquire independence of movements, we can decide and act with responsibility ¿ why we want to limit, condition and restrict that we can do with no strings attached only for the usual presence of someone ? Who wonders deeply about why we want to have a partner or children ? If not even in personal affairs and social behavior we don´t act with the due correction, how can we fit two distinct entities with the respective areas to improve in a link to the search for harmony ?          Imagination, illusion, it fades when it realizes an unreached level essential to be satisfied in the mutual transmission.                                                                                                                                                    Conversations, resources and activities is what we share. Is the bar of these high, medium or low ? If is not high, is it worth taking out a mortgage for a sporadic company ? If there is not a perspective view, an extensive knowledge of the other, what can we expect of the most demanding bond of all ? More inertia. We only can convey our uniqueness with virtues and defects, and if prevail the mediocrity, the dificulty it will be noticeable in the exchanges filled with disonances.                                                                            We depend on third parties for specific consideration, but they do not condition the organization, space and daily decisions. The usual presence of someone only will be what is be able offer, in the aspects that can like or disturb, we can not expect to receive what is not gifted to give. This must be clear.                     The goal of a couple is be elevated by what we learn and teach each other, but if there is not the essential maturity nor will decrypt the messages nor will be able to use them to polish ourselves and the relation fulfill its purpose.                                                                                                                                              Love alone is not enough, the consistency of the link is a set of factors aimed at a progressive refinement in the expressions. The trap of affects is getting carried away by emotions without tuning in to all the fronts that enter in the scene.