COMPLAINTS COME FROM THE VOID

Why do we complain ? Why from our point of view it is not happening in the past or in the present with the correction that should be between the potential and what is. We can complain for various reasons : because something is missing; for poor service; due to poor conditions; for not receiving careful attention. In short, failure, low quality, not being up to what is offered. Frequent complaints are directed at human incompetence or to a malfunction of machinery. Between what we want and what is there, the argumentative protest indicating the faults and the possible resolution alternatives, revealing the obstruction with the tools and means to unblock it.                                                                                         There are well founded  and also unwarranted complaints. Waste of time, money, repetition, because at some point in the process the harmony has been broken and the stranding has surfaced to show deterioration,negligence, inconsideration or ineptitude.                                                                                  There are individual complaints from you to you, and collective complaints in the form of strikes and demonstrations. The strikes are of a labor nature in demand of better conditions. The demonstrations are of a social nature for what is already in force or novelties that they want to prevent. Compalining indicates that the substance of the matter is not correct, is not appropriate, and improvement is needed to correct this Are those who protest always right ? It depends of what they intend, the room for maneuver betwen what is possible or not, between the more or less. Want more or different for a more satisfactory future than the present is the goal.                                                                                                                                           Everyone wants the permanent optimal functioning of what we use, of need, of the private and socially shared, And the external is the reflection of the internal. What´s outside doesn´t work as it should, with breakdowns, delays, inconvenients, is that doesn´t work in a considerable number of people. And we just have to focus on relationships, in the environment, in the deterioration of nature and behavior. Dissonances, conflicts, tension, aggression it has been forged progressively by not fitting one´s own desires with the environment. These generally they are the ones who tend to complain, Unable to realize their attitude and subsequent consequences. Behind what does not work at full capacity there is a touch of attention . It´s about finding out the cause and taking advantage of it by making the appropriate adjustments

LOWS PREVENT PROGRESS

Duality is present everywhere, two parts with unique characteristics performing a function where dependence pushes to establish connections in search of a goal that brings a result.                                       We have to make constant connections, and we have to know how. We can do it basically thinking about satisfying the desires of the ego, or with a breadth of horizons that realize the need to look for the globality of mutual benefifs.                                                                                                                                             What do we usually see in the prevailing claims of many people ? The own personal profit without a broad perspective of the possible consequences of what is intended and the impact on others.                               Society is designed for an order. Every time an action classified as wrong, rules and laws make an assessment by rendering a verdict. If we proceed according to the just we do not have to fear danger or losses. If we transgress the code of conduct, sooner or later we will find ourselves immerse in tribulations. Swindle, steal, kidnap, rape, kill, they are all manifestations of desires to satiate the lower primary nature at the expense of others with agressive methods where momentary gain leads to dire long term consequences. Getting money in different ways is the goal. These criminals are unawere that each has individual supervision that places us in a specific place with precise characteristics for our individual function in relation to the collective.                                                                                                                Transgressions worsen the conditions, hence is why is it so difficult get out of this cercle if is not through consciousness of diametrically opposed purposes with everything that involves the approachs and staging. What drives you to mistreat ? From the mildest to the greatest aberrations. How has the degradation been forged in the individual ? Nothing happens by random. Who is robbed is because he has a debt due to previous conduct deviate from what is considered correct. Who receives an aggression, even if it looks casual on the outside, it is not. Is difficult to know the origin and the innocence of the victim in appearance. The criminal has tuned into a low vibration and serves as a warning, however, having transgressed the laws will receive the corresponding sanction or punishment in the appropriate measure and time.                                                                                                                                                           Every day multiple episodes happen of aggressors and assaulted,indicating that we are misguided in our pretensions, and by violating the integrity of others we will not even get the resources we long for, neither peace nor tranquility nor freedom. The lows only lead to precipice experienced on all fronts.

EXACERBATED PURITANISM

We complain easily irritated by trifles which we raise to an enormous category, a reflection of the prevailing narowness of concepts that are disproportionately valued for lack of breadth.Everything comes down to what I think, believead and value from an ego point of view.                                                                  What is punishable ? What is considered impure ?  Who knows how to perfectly distinguish the difference between right and wrong ? What can be done and what can not, what is acceptable and what unacceptable. some words, some tastes, a way of dressing. What´s wrong ? What is inappropiate ? for what reason ? every word, every expression, every action, is examined with a magnifying glass and the insignificant runs wild. overreacts, and then spend days and days turning around specific anecdotes treating the case and the alleged offenders as demons.                                                                                                                            We have drunk our understanding, we are in the era of exacerbated puritanism. Everything can be put into question, and if you don´t like what we say or do, the accusing finger wants to pass judgement and must be exemplary.                                                                                                                                                    There are moral policemen monitoring the dress, and other areas exactly the same. Is best to keep distances and don´t put the hands to according which places  and nor interpret that we force someone.         On the one hand we are not prepared to tolerate what is considered an infringement, but we are ready  to consent the people similar like us.                                                                                                                   There are people that cross boundaries when the behavior becomes intimidating, invades the space of others, puts the integrity in risk, and every case must be observed with foundation.                                        Never will be possible an unanimity when behind the crooshairs the criteria and values are sustained by morality, ethics or a determined religion. Costs a lot to be equanimous and unbiased when it is imbued with an often reductionist vision unable to expand the perspective and show more mercy instead the maximum severity.                                                                                                                                           Are all laws fair ? Are all judge infallible  ? If the laws have shortcomings or are incorrect. If the judges they are often driven by their own assesssments. If the fundamentalists are not impeccable, Then how should we proceed to restore purity ?

RESIGNATION

Resignation assumes that we have a defined goal and when we set in motion to make it happen, circumstances beyond our control prevent us from achieving this. Resignation shows us on several occasions that one thing is what we want and the other is what is possible. It is the most effective way to tame the ego and strengthen humility.                                                                                                              Accept what can not be changed. Things happen constantly that we are powerless to prevent the course of events, where the only thing we  can do is take note so that the losses or the harmful serve us as a reference for later.                                                                                                                                             By choice or by force is how we can respond. Fortunately without resisting or giving too much importance. By force for not being able to face the context.                                                                         Resignation is impotence before the facts. The desire is one thing and the result is another. It also helps not to rely too much on the process that goes from the beginning to the end, specially if it depends on the external collaboration of others or unforeseen situations far from our scope of maneuver.                             Sometimes may be it´s good not to get what we want because of the later consequences. We must be clear about the  objective and possible triggers. Park the purpose temporarily if the context is not favorable, and insist later when the conditions may bring more possibilities.                                                                         Everyone experience episodes where has to resign. Personal longings involve externalization and depend on the environment, of skills, of resources, of others.Achieving it is a matter of our temperament and what is most convenient. Accepting outcomes with peace reinforces maturity. Of the many things we would like to obtain a certain way, in the end we do it according to what is necessary at each moment both individually and collectively.                                                                                                                           If we achieved all the claims quickly without obstacles or oppositions, it would be very harmful to the individual himself. To learn, expand the consciousness, we must fit continually with others and the environment, and the occasions that do not occur as desired, they are great opportunities to focus on what is convenient uncovering the background of the event in order to pour the energy in more appropiate ways.

OPEN TO, CLOSE TO

Open can indicate start, close can indicate finish. What do we want to open up to ?  What do we want to close ? Sometimes opening up has favorable connotations, and others not according to the context and what it can cause. And the same goes for closing. Sometimes is advisable, and sometimes not. We must open ourselves to what can represent an improvement, possible healthy earnings,and expand horizons. . And vice versa in terms of closing, in that which put us in danger, which lead to losses, that leads to ill, to deterioration.                                                                  Open is a synonymous to externalize, close to internalize. We must be open to constantly increasing our potential and with the discernment to know when it is not appropiate to open up to what experiences can be more harmful than advantageous. Internalization is essential to reveal what drives us to say, to dor or what we want and where go.                                                                                                                            In the morning when we wake up facing  a new day, externalization begins, social contact, execution of activities. In the evening, after fulfilling the obligations, is time for introspection, to analyze our diary behavior to know possibles hits and errors and how improve them.                                                                Open to determined relations and close to others. The various changes in the time of friends, occupations, means and opening and closing. Beginnings meant opening and endings meant closing.                               With the years changes tastes, criteria and values, and this implies open to a certain questions in one determined time, and then closng. Those relevant activities, friends that seem to fit so well with us, suddenly disappears and they are replaced by other tendencies and other contacts that marks new stages. Everything is part of everyone´s process, some stagnant, and other renewing themselves, depending on the temperament and concerns of these involved.                                                                                                 Which was good in a period to open in order the further development and goals, then is better closing. And what had been unconscious or unknown it starts to become part of what we value, open to experience to what suits the characteristics of the moment.                                                                                               Know open to or close to, is the challenge that acompanies us every day to choose the most convenient.

A LOT OF VISCERALITY AND LITTLE INTELLIGENCE

Aspirants to govern municipalities or a country can such a low level  of preparation, with unpresentables speeches, continuously attacking the adversaries that do not agree with their points of view, where the only thing they know is to pollute the environment twitching in all ways ? Where is the capacity of the citizens to support a group of energumens similar to suburban gangs, with plenty of previous records of corruption and disastrous management ? How is it possible to defend projects that in the past meant censorship and dctatroship, eliminate rights, go against the needs of the moment, and have broad support from the population ? What do the voters think ? Is this their ability to discern ? Giving power to a bunch of trechers with an obvious lack of culture and civility, hypersensitivities for their simbols and elevate these  to the category of sacred, while in the same proportion freeze to eliminate everything they can not bear in the most despotic ways possible ?                                                                                                        Of mouth indivisible unity, and the actions are constantly on the way to division. Separatism is the culprit, yes, what they curse everyday to impose the will of one party to another.                                                      Can keep someone to be with you by force and you just repeat that you can´t leave why do I say it.The kidnapper sets the law, the rules, and the kidnapped must abide by them, because if he rebels will be punishment, attacks and persecution. This is the panorama that has existed since the time immemorial, it neither changes nor is seen in the short term, because too many people are driven by viscerality without seeing the bottom line and the consequences because intelligence has simply been left aside.

THE PERVERSIONS BEHIND THE WORDS UNITY AND FREEDOM

The treasures of perversion bring no profit. A self gratifying narcissistic perversion of wealth, power and position, they ultimately lead to ruin in some area. The one built on a toxic foundation may last for some time, but in due course accounts will have to be passed.                                                                                 Unity by force is not unity, it is only with will, fit and affinity. special laws, a power structure with multiple tentacles to reduce and dilute dissidents with verbal and physical aggression, it can never be unity because the actions themselves deny it.                                                                                                           Freedom for me, imposition for the different ones that I don´t like. Freedom to speak my language in my own house and in that of the neighbour who has a different culture and language, making it more mandatory, while the natives can not demand basic respect. The oppressed at the expense of the oppressors, remaining as outsiders in their own territory.                                                                               The supremacists have the freedom to impose language and customs in foreign places, they are not obliged to know the language of the subjugated, and the natives must know by decree that of the occupier.  Freedom for the oppressor it means saying and doing whatever they want without consequences. But depending of what the opponent says or do, it can be classified as a hate crime or whatever they decide.           Greatness is not having a skyscraper and being bothered by small corner store doing everything they can to eliminate it.                                                                                                                                                   Greatness is to have a dish full to spill and want to take more that the little that have of the neighbour.      Greatness it is not vexing, humiliating, insulting, disqualifyng so that they speak to you in the language you want using the force of authority and power.                                                                                                  How can you qualify that you can´t stand someone but you don´t want to let them go ? When you don´t like someone or something, the most logical thing is to stay away from them.                                              How can it be understood that you want to subjugate the opponent so that you take advantage of him financiallly, and at the same time drown him financially ?.                                                                            Everything is a sign of enormous perversion and also of a deep imbalance.                                                   Bragging about quantity, that they are more, that they have more, chasing those who are quantitatively less or have less. Where is the logic of this obsession ?                                                                                         What sense and what purpose is there beyond the appearances for one party to be the oppressor and the other to endure it ?                                                                                                                                            Centuries and centuries of the same ideas, the same goal, where the result is submission and an economic profit, in exchange for a permanent discomfort that turns the day to day in a nuissance. After all pursuing wretched ends with petty procedures. Materials earnings in exchange for spiritual losses who with their blindness to mental and emotional dirt ignore the repercussion it will end up having.

TIES USUAL, OCCSASIONAL, CLOSE OR DISTANT

What do we really decide ? What real degree of freedom do we have to choose ? Why does everyone have specific relationships ? Fathers, sons, couple, they are all intermediaries. Each one performs a function with certain characteristics, where proximity and assiduity bring out our true essence. We are constantly tested to develop the potential to move from the unconscious to conscious, of the defense of one´s own interests to give and share. The failure of relationships and the low quality of these is why selfishness prevail and the straitjacket. So neither one nor the other play the role of messengers wasting the content of what we are showing.                                                                                                                                        The ties are inevitable, no one can live in isolation, and if it does so respect to people, it can not avoid the dependence of nature. The shortcomings force us to externalize ourselves, to establish connections, And if we are looking for good conditions, why do we adopt unpleasant postures, aggression, knowing that we need supports to covert deficits ?                                                                                                                     The needs to acquire resources it makes establish ties. First at school for mental nourishment. After in job training for material sustenance. And not necessarily some are looking for a partner and children to fill the  emotional side.                                                                                                                                          The ties can last more or less, and sooner or later they all end up being transitory, from here the need of detachment to avoid frustrations, because the companies enter and leaving in our vital stage, they are to play a role aimed at expanding our faculties.                                                                                                   Relationships are necessary for the coupling between the individual and the collective, and at the same time none is essential.                                                                                                                                       What we have extracted from the different context and stages ? What have learned from those people we like and those who dislike ? Have we been able in a one to one and hierachical relationship ? Do we know how to decipher what bothers us about someone and why do we have to experience it ? Have we taken advantage of the passage through the different areas and time to improve the expressions ?                          Ties are connections, and just like the machines works if there is a proper fit, exactly to human level. If there are disagreements, tensions and discomfort, there is a mismatch, and we have to find out where it is for the link to fulfill its purpose.

Man and woman they have been created back to back. Will they turn ?

We are all the product of the union of the two male and female principles, therefore although externally in the physical aspect we distinguish ourselves by a certain sex, the other principle is also in us.                       Man and woman have been created back to back. Everyone looks in opposite directions and they can´t see each other faces. The work of both consists of turning around and seeing each other head on, to identify and establish agreements based on implicit differences and that they work for unity in diversity.                  Be the same in essential but different in the rest. Fit the differences is a constant task taking into account the respective code of values, criteria, and quite opposite conceptions on several significant fronts. What is needed first is to acquire deep archetipal knowledge of the same gender, and then do the same with the other opposite to ours. Know why we are the way we are and the cause, giving us much greater and more satisfying possibilities..                                                                                                                                    Men are transmitters at a mental and physical level, and receivers in the emotional aspect. On the other hand, women are emotional transmitters and mental and physical receivers .Aware of these basic points, it is a matter of good disposition arising from a coherent broad discernment and the indispensable affection  it brings to establish links.                                                                                                                                The challenge is to internalize the qualities of the other polarity in us to not have external dependencies. And because this task is difficult and requires great effort and discipline, we hardly incorporate the attributes of the other sex in the optimal magnitude. Hence the majority look for the supplement that they believe will cover gaps or deficiencies.                                                                                                           Love binds, wisdom unties. What do we want ties for ? For love of someone or for own because of what the bond may imply. To bind oneself is to limit, and there must be a compelling reason and one purpose. The social evolutionary level in all cultures, is not enough developed to establish a couple relation that is the more demanding, and allow both individual and collective progress as a whole due to personal interests in oneslf and the interaction and one refined sensitivity to express altruistic love.                           Before conditioning ourselves with the responsibilities that will be incorporated we must ask ourselves primoridial questions . Why want this relation ? Can drive to show the best ? There is authentic enthusiasm in what I feel ? What I can supposedly earn can have more value tha what I enjoyed before the engagement ?                                                                                                                                                    There is too much fantasy, supposition and imagination over the idealization of what may lie ahead to fit in all areas. Choosing a partner in the west is usually for love, but this must be guided for wisdom, and fit both, because is the only manner to understanding both and have possibilities in the continuity that it will have to be constantly monitored.

WHAT DO WE WANT TIES FOR ( II )

The essential point for a nexus to report profit is the fit. We check it inside a clock, a circuit, or the key and the door.                                                                                                                                                      Everyone has a uniqueness, we will not find anyone exactly alike manifesting in everything like us, therefore, in the differences lies the effort if it is intended to combine the contributions of each part.           If we want fluid exchanges we have to find out our own character to know where the strengths and weaknesses are in order to proceed appropriately in each relationship and context that allows the best fit for the intended objectives.                                                                                                                            There must always be an interest that pushes us to leave us and have bridges of proximity with someone.   ¿ what are we looking for ? ¿ what exactly do we want ? ¿ what can the other provide us that we can not ? ¿ and what can we offer in exchange ? In order to make a suitable approach, the wider the self  knowledge, the better it can be the favorable result in the intended. If we don´t know how to define why we are like this nor distinguish whether we are on the right track or not, coupling with someone will have little chance of success. Unfortunately, this is what has been observed time and time again.                                             Unconsciously we acquire ties to some characteristic we like, retreating to a very narrow margin with respect to the whole, and once immersed in the adventure of commitment, the day to day awakens us from the illusion with " the lot " of each one, the complete package of who we are, surfacing disagreements, tensions and discomfort, and what seemed so beautiful suddenly lands us.                                                   We should not expect the feeling of well being from a single person with his impurities and shortcomings, why the most precious goods are intangible, and peace, silence, tranquility, and recollection come from within.                                                                                                                                                                What real progress have couples experienced after decades of coexistence individually or together ? Have we deciphered what we had to learn, polish, amend through the other to improve our expressions ? Of the previous imaginations of supposed satisfaction, what percentage has been evidenced ?  how many times have we thought of undoing the link due to boredom, stagnation and without a purpose that justifies the continuity ?                                                                                                                                                       It is the calculation of various factors that prevents the merger and the progress of the exchanges. The superficiality that permeates the relationship deprives of experiencing quality, and if we add the selfish part and considerable immaturity, it is not possible to achieve the purpose that must be provided by the fit of the two distinct identities working as a unit.