INTOLERANCE AND IMPOSITION ( II )

Intolerance implies imposition " this no, that yes ". Behaviors or situations categorized as incorrect they must be neutralized by measures that counteract it. Incivility is fought with civility, aggressions with respect. Expressions considered inappropriate are not tolerated ¿ but what are these really ? If in a given culture the same acts are not punishable and in other parts they deserve punisment ¿ who measures and who is right in the assessments ' There are impartial intolerant and partial intolerant. Those who are equanimous in the face of similar events sticking to some principles. And the partials that are tough on opponents or about what don´t like, and on the other hand if theirs do then they are condescending and it doesn´t matter. There are two types on intolerant and two types om impostors, intolerant driven by selfish interests or desires, not to claim the just suitable or convenient, rejecting anything that jeopardizes their claims. And the intolerant who moves thinking about the whole and the adverse consequences depending on what acts, and to combat it it needs decrees, laws and regulations. Who measures what is tolerable that what is not ? At what point are the boundaries crossed ? How can we know if the diagnosis is correct ? Is intolerable means " this can not be, can not be done " it is to be assumed by the consequences and the impact. What exactly is wrong ? the background, the shapes, both ? what is the retort of the intolerant ? what do they offer ? Impose what we want according to subjective values or ideas, if it leads to contempt, humililiation, invading the land of others, this can not be tolerated, is intolerable. The dictator we carry inside repel what is far from our tastes, crieria and values. However, it is one thing to dislike and another not tolerate. Between acceptance and non acceptance it implies greater factors of rejection of what is manifested. One would no longer have to be intolerant if everyone made sure to be right, nor would impositions be required when each behaved neatly. Both intolerance and imposition they may arise from primitivism or civility. Observing the posture and the result we will know if it inclines in one or in the other direction.

INTOLERANCE AND IMPOSITION ( I )

What is not tolerated ? What is said or how is it said ? What is done or how is it done ? What highlights our mistakes, inaccuracies ? What is the underlying reason for feeling so offended ? And the retort of not accepting what is said or done, is imposing another way of saying and doing. What we say or do is absolute truth, absolute justice, what is really right ? Behind these manifestations are too many egoic influxes and much mediocrity of believing it untouchable. Day by day we witness these nonsense. Of insignificant comments originate wildfires. Of a simple protest the dissidents must be severely punished. What does not sound good to the ear must be removed, covered or punished.Then those who only think of censoring speak of freedom, by oppressing, liquidating, so that only his dictatorial desire reigns to say and do whatever they want, but opponents must be suppressed. How do conflicts originate ? By the dispute between two discordant parties deffending different interests where the strongest want to make the weakest give up so that their ideological and power claims are imposed by force. And so the years pass. So much for filling your mouth with good intentions or pronounce the word democracy when the facts show the rudeness of the methods in search of unworthy objectives. And the reasonable citizen until when we must continue to tolerate brutality, indecency, the unjust justice and the gang of conjurers who govern ? Perhaps we organize ourselves and let the abused be the ones who impose the canons of conduct that truly sould reign.

WHY DO WE WANT WHAT WE WANT ( II )

What do we want and what should we want ? Does the impulse come from inferior or refined nature ? Will the beloved leads us to what we need ? With very limited knowledge, disconnected from the root of our idiosyncrasy and pending to decipher the why of situations, relationships and circumstances for its purpose ¿ how many of us truly know what to ask for and be more appropriate according to the individual peculiarities and goals to achieve ? We want what is external to us, for if we have it internalized we don´t ask for it. According to the longed for will be to internalize it temporarily or projected indefinitely. Preserving or achieving what we don´t have involves some kind of exchange, an effort where we have to offer or give something in return. If they are transient things or small quantity decisions can be made quickly. In large scale investments or in acquiring long term commitments, we will have to weigh pros and cons extensively for the consequences and the possible incidence in different sections. Everyone depends on the essentials, and the particular conditions of each one with room for maneuver, the individual function to be performed and the claims to be set through time, it will make us want some things or others. There will be things that will accompany us briefly, others a season, others perhaps decades, and only a few constantly. It will all depend on the service and the fulfillment of the purpose, whether it is a context, objects or relationships, pointing out that we don´t have to cling to anything because it may disappear whether we like it or not. Accumulate days is established in DNA. Most don´t ask why and to do what, and we must want to raise the bar of nonconformism in order to not susbsit and enough. Find out in depth the goal of weight and value of why we are the way we are and what we must carry out that gives meaning and benefit to experiences and efforts. Linking constant beginnings and endings, one routine after another it must be much more than covering files and keeping us going, amd what we should want is to illuminate what is behind it of what we do and see endowing the existence of meaning.

WHY DO WE WANT WHAT WE WANT ? ( I )

Wanting requires appreciation. Without appreciation there is not desire, and if we don´t give value or even rejection, prevents wanting. Wanting is the key that set us in motion, wheter by own will,need or obligation. We want what nourishes us : food, resources, knowledge, affections. And also other elements that are not indispensable but desirable. Wanting involves selecting and choosing according the possibilities, tastes and desires. Wanting contains several phases : maintain or increases the existing one, eliminate some of what we have or get the unavailable now. We want quantity and that it contains quality, and being able to access these depends on current evolutionary circumstances of each one to have mental clarity and fundamental resources to carry out the approach and appropriate actions to facilitate it. We must want optimal material conditions to execute the individual function according to the place we occupy and the social contributions to perform. And on the journey discover the potential and shortcomings to find the intended purpose of goals that go beyond the apparent. To want is to add or multiply in what we intend, and subtract and divide in what we want remove. We have to see clearly if what we want suit us, otherwise we will be embezzling resources that should be invested in the profit. A bad investment instead of entailing gains become losses. We want things for us o for give it to someone. For personal use or external items, and before to decide the acquisiton by investing time or money, observe the purpose and practical application. Wanting implies quantity with the exception of the intangible ones which cannot be measured such as silence, peace or tranquility. The quality of the quantity that is measurable depends on the materials, its precise treatment and location for the intended useful service. We want immediate things,in the short medium or long term. We want prolong well being and reduce the discomfort. We want health,good conditions, and getting anything there is always an exchange between that we can offer and the goal to achieve, and the better eqquiped we are in every way best benefits we can get.

TO FIT OR NOT FIT

The proper functioning of what surround us it´s a matter of fit. Several individualities with the respective singularities and contributions, need the support of other individuals, where the resources and shortcomings of each other to carry out exchanges that supply the desired, if they fit together, the purpose of the established links is achieved. To fit is from duality, 1+1. Externalization pushes us to be linked by dependencies, and in a constant offers and demand on a personal and commercial level the ideal coupling must occur in each context. Surrounded by animated and inanimated objects, of people and animals, all have a function and benefits, trying to relate to us in a timely manner for profit and harmony. Subject and object conveniently coupled is the milestone to pursue at all times. Between sender and receiver, give and receive, there must be a nexus that allow the proper connection, because the bonds pursue some kind of fit; otherwise the links are useless. We fit with others through tastes, ideals,specific affinites, feelings, goals. If it is the opposite we will not be able to fit. Tastes, ideas, different trends, it will be difficult to fit if there is no point to unclog it. We can fit by equality or similarity, and also by differences when each party provides what the other needs as a complement. We feel comfortable with who we fit into one or more points according to our idiosyncrasy, and especially the way we think and value what we have. And on the opposite side when others differ discomfort immediately arises. This is due to the egoic forms of reaction. We may dislike it and disagree with the exposures and/or manners of someone, but the opportunities to extract messages and profit it can come from both what is pleasing and unpleasant to us. The fit on an epoch with friendhips and couples, when the paths diverge, proximity becomes distance, and passes to the non fit, indicating that the fit must be continuosly monitored. In one way or another we all look for the right way to adjust us, because discord is what does not adjust, and therefore does not serve. Reach an agreement between the parties that intervenes, know how to behave, make a fair deal, these and other factors they must lead to fit , because if we are not skilled by proceeding properly, the result will lead to non fit.

DIALECTICAL BOREDOM

Much ignoraance and little knowledge is the prominent tonic. The majority interests are personal and material. Vision and focus arise from limitation and are superficial. In the face of this evidence, what communication can emerge ? Reiterative arguments, always wandering in routine matters, what final profit are we able to extract ? Where everyone is, interests, the concerns, certain inclinations, the ability to understand, values, is what we show in conversations, and if we stopped at one point and didn´t move, the only thing we do and keep doing is going around to the same subjects that do not contribute novelties nor a broader perspective to break inertia. In an encounter catching up requires a few minutes, the posterior extension with insubstantial banalities is to add filling comments and empty the backgrounbd chatter of content. We can only give what we have, and listening everyday a lot of linked words to say nothing neither provide reflections nor useful learning, it simply reveals the very long pending path of development that is indispensable to realize to consider ourselves evolutinarily advanced. Global limitation keeps us in this society of constant conflicts with the consequent relationship problems. The years go by and the utensils of daily use change, more comfortables, with more benefits, and instead of applying it as well in our behavior improving the precise areas, we continue with the multiple expressions that lead to discord. As a result of not knowing how to behave, the retort are demonstrations, strikes, demands. It has ever been able to succeed if it was unsustanaible to preserve the existing, without a force to impose, succumbing to the minority of power but with the executing force. As well as useless repetitive speeches, the same form of vindication in actions which mantain the prevailing immobility, should think about a change of strategy, a different approach that overflow the status quo, because only with words and some threat, is not enough to demolish the armored wall of those who govern, and to make this possible is necessary to increase individual and collective wisdom, on the contrary, perpetuation of dialectical and also everyday boredom.

WHAT WE EXTRACT FROM EACH THING

Mobility means the pursue of some kind of achievement. To do for do not exist, consciously or unconsciously the dynamizing motivation is the extraction of a result at the end of the journey. If there is no interest, if we are indifferent, if we find out that efforts will be in vain, we don´t get started. We have inserted into the deepest of us profitability, which can bring a benefit, feeling of well being, although depending on what is involved later it can cause discomfort. We need to see clearly the goals with pros and cons, if it is worth the process we will have to speed up and the possible results. If perhaps it is better to focus on other more profitable areas, because every action has consequences, and these will be in line with the correctness or incorrectness. What do we want to extract ? What advantages will be gain by pursuing certain goals ? We can not receive attacks quiet and silent, because they are only possible by what we say or do. Someone may say that there are people who have received insults or aggressions without giving rise to it being so. What we don´t know is the history of each one and the triggers to end up receiving. Sometimes out of commitment, out of friendship, out of affection, we do not seek to extract anything for ourselves from the action executed, in these cases, the extraction of the task is done thinking about the satisfaction of the other person. In any field, whatever the activity, from the most relevant to the most insignificant, if there is no possibility of an extraction in the form of benefit or enjoyment, there will be no indispensable motivation to set us in motion. Our pretensions need a means of action, provide us with physical and mental resources, and establish connexions with people and utensils as a support for the dynamized end up bearing fruit. Shortcomings and dependencies force us to fit in the individuals with the collective. And this must serve as a reference for the coupling and the harmony extends to all areas to set the optimal guidelines focused on the common good

CHRONIC INFANTILISM

What are the characteristics of the infant stage ? Maximum dependence, unconsciousness, ignorance, desire to selfish receive, global limitation on being in the process of formation. The progressive maturity where should lead us ? Precisely to the opposite factors. Parents are the basis of support,and the spearhead to project us socially depends on us once we acquire the indispensable development. How many adults remain unconscious for ignorance ? A lot. And if is so it means that childish reminiscences are still present. How many people already of working age remain self centered without considering others in the need to perform equitable exchanges in the eternal give and receive ? In each epoch we should be in line with its specificities, what can not be is to increase the age but not mature. Child self centering is normal due to deficiencies, for emotional responses, but then we have to be responsible for what we want, of what we do and the consequences, and this mean taking into account the incidence of our actions in the environment. When we blame someone for the events by shedding responsibility; when we demand in bad ways; when we have to win even with traps; when we deceive, exaggerate, distorts the facts; when an observation or reflection can not be endured in order to improve as if we were perfect and had to correct nothing; when each movemment is only in our behalf. All these manifestations are a reflection of chronic infantilism. Who is truly mature is serious, responsible, assumes the consequences of the task, it does not seek excuses, but solutions, and instead of complaints, focuses on expanding horizons in the experienced.

BETWEEN CERTAINTY AND UNCERTAINTY ( II )

Immersed in duality we face the day to day between the certainty and uncertainty. We have the certainty that we have to face specific tasks, we know how to do it, but as long as the hypothetical future does not become present, uncertainty will remain as to how the facts will unfold. Certainty is unity, the verified, the known. Uncertainty is duality, perhaps yes perhaps no, because it has not been completed or has not been verified. We want security, but the subject to movements and changes cannot be assured. What is permanent, indestructible, strengthens the confidence so that is it predictable. The subject to oscillations, not controllable by us, depending on nature or other persons, inevitably keep us in the uncertainty. We begin the day with a few purposes, a new day to fill, but we don´t know what will happen, what contingencies may arise, of the planned what will be executed and what will not. The conditions of the moment, adjust and readjust continuously. In a second what was firm, solid, consistent, can deteriorate or disappear. Our life made to make constant connections between the left behind and the next novelty, it does not guarantee durability. Now we are here present and tomorrow we don´t know if we will continue in this world. Everything is transitory, provisional, but we must proceed from action to action, from one realm to another in an everchanging present. The certainty acquired by knowledge and experience are the resources employed in the purposes, and as we fill in the gaps, uncertainty becomes certainty. The spiritual precepts are intangible, and we see through experiences the results. They serve as a reference, they are permanent and eternal, being a mainstay of certainty when checking them over and over again. The actions commited for material purposes must be based on spiritual principles. The principles give us certainty, the process underway is uncertain, with the certainty that the result will be in line to the approach or distance respect to the basic principles.

BETWEEN CERTAINTY AND UNCERTAINTY ( I )

For more planning, each new day must be filled with knowledge and resources. Let´s look for what we don´t have, uncertainty for certainty of how to proceed. We obtain certainty through experience and results. We rely on precedents. Uncertainty can be an unfinished process where external factors can bring unforeseen surprises. Certainty are evidences from a past, and uncertainty it has connotations for the future. Certainty is an element of security, and uncertainty is synonymous of insecurity. Let´s be more or less aware, everyone knows there are some patterns to follow which serve as a referent to act to fit into the collective. If we follow the postulates trying to be correct, we can have the certainty of good results at the end. Instead, the transgressions materials or spirituals, sooner or later lead to a debt to pay. The uncertainty is not know when neither how nor in what proportion. Certainty requires testing : weigh, see, measure, because if we can´t weigh, see or measure,then they are assumptions or perceptions, and if they not materialize in facts they are only speculations. Certainty wants tangible demostrations otherwise we can not be sure. From uncertainty to certainty it passes on the basis of concretions. And for more mastery or knowledge, if it depends on third parties or the environment, uncertainty will hover. The dependence on nature, on exchanges, makes us vulnerable and it keeps in uncertainty about what we will get in the short or long term. Between the desire and the reality we are constantly debating, in a changing environment at the mercy of uncontrollable elements, and for more knowledge of cause, uncertainty accompanies us every day.