INTOLERANCE AND IMPOSITION ( II )

Intolerance implies imposition " this no, that yes ". Behaviors or situations categorized as incorrect they must be neutralized by measures that counteract it. Incivility is fought with civility, aggressions with respect. Expressions considered inappropriate are not tolerated ¿ but what are these really ? If in a given culture the same acts are not punishable and in other parts they deserve punisment ¿ who measures and who is right in the assessments ' There are impartial intolerant and partial intolerant. Those who are equanimous in the face of similar events sticking to some principles. And the partials that are tough on opponents or about what don´t like, and on the other hand if theirs do then they are condescending and it doesn´t matter. There are two types on intolerant and two types om impostors, intolerant driven by selfish interests or desires, not to claim the just suitable or convenient, rejecting anything that jeopardizes their claims. And the intolerant who moves thinking about the whole and the adverse consequences depending on what acts, and to combat it it needs decrees, laws and regulations. Who measures what is tolerable that what is not ? At what point are the boundaries crossed ? How can we know if the diagnosis is correct ? Is intolerable means " this can not be, can not be done " it is to be assumed by the consequences and the impact. What exactly is wrong ? the background, the shapes, both ? what is the retort of the intolerant ? what do they offer ? Impose what we want according to subjective values or ideas, if it leads to contempt, humililiation, invading the land of others, this can not be tolerated, is intolerable. The dictator we carry inside repel what is far from our tastes, crieria and values. However, it is one thing to dislike and another not tolerate. Between acceptance and non acceptance it implies greater factors of rejection of what is manifested. One would no longer have to be intolerant if everyone made sure to be right, nor would impositions be required when each behaved neatly. Both intolerance and imposition they may arise from primitivism or civility. Observing the posture and the result we will know if it inclines in one or in the other direction.