INTOLERANCE

What is tolerable ? What is intolerable ? Without a doubt, it can not be objective when it comes to valuing various factors that depend on some ideological, cultural criteria, desires and convictions. What is normal for some is detestable for others, and vice versa the same. ¿ Who is in the possession of the truth ? Whatever is equitable, respectful, considered, who treats with dignity who is different.

What must be intolerant are all those actions that generate personal injury, in the physical or in urban goods. Now, catalog it as intolerable certain words, some songs, some colors, some flags, certain pretensions, it is own of dictators.

The intolerant is the one who can not bear anything that is not to his liking which is diametrically opposed to their tastes. But which refers to their identity, to its features, is intolerable and it can not be questioned, it comes to be as it is possessed of a divine grace, that indicates what is good and what not, what is acceptable and what is not.

The intolerants are extra super sensitive with their distinctive peculiarities, and in the same proportion extreme hardness for those who do not conform to their canons.

Sickness sensitivity versus maximum insensivity.

When the freedom of expression is threatened, the problem is not what is said, the problem is for those who want to plug mouths, who wants to close someone in a room so that it does not bother, who want forbid everything that does not plead to him. And moved by an irreflexive visceral emotions, they don´t realize that a more oppression more insistence and desire for freedom ot those who are opposites.Unable to see clearly and in perspective, each step leading to the imposition by force it turned against him, because this attitude goes against establishing harmonious ties. And is only a matter of time that the clumsy forms increase the chaos that forces to change the imposition because follow in the same way it only lengthens dilemmas that they can only be solved with an attitude and civilized disposition

THE PRIMACY : FAILURE OF THE HUMANITY

The failure of the humanity is pay attention to materials goals that generate one part against other for the lack of consciousness which prevents to realize the wrong approach and the negative consequences that arises from it.

We are here in this planet to decrypt the individual function aimed at implanting neatness and harmony, and the ignorant forms create separation, conflicts and numbness.

What we note diary ? A defenseless majority battered by a prevailing power that instead of guarding the people they have immersed in multiple difficulties in any cases, and in others when they think that it can stagger the status quo, goes directly  to prosecutions, threats, aggressions and imprison dissidents, using all the mechanisms at their fingertips based on manipulating, falsifying with imaginable and unimaginable perversions in order to satisfy some low passions of domination, control and subyugation in search of some miserable ends.

The materialistic focus has allowed  to restore tools and conditions that facilitates the work and provide comfort. And the imbalance between having and being keeps unconnected the majority of their center and true purpose. Pending of volatile we lose the solid. In search of the ephemeral lose the eternal. From here originate all tensions and disagreements.

Years go by, centuries, changing clothes and instruments of use, but if if we don´t change the internal essence we continue commiting the same atrocities of always.

We are trapped by the stablishment that acts like gangsters lack of scruples where they can do all kinds of dirty game, traps, skipping ethics and moral codes leaving unpunished. While the street citizen is defenseless and in danger even don´t commit any offense.

What´s the use be surrounded by sophisticated devices when the behavior does not differ from the Middle Age immersed in various precariousnesses in an environment of discomfort and gripped by feet and hands to reverse the established power ?

The degradation of forms it derives from the spiritual poverty which makes being blind, deaf and dumb, and with the feel disabled, the inability manifest irself in actions that worsen without stopping the current context without expectations of improvement while the brutality continues imposing itself on wisdom.

BETWEEN CONFORMISM AND INCONFORMISM

What do we have to conform to ? Why ? What do we have to inconform ? Why ? 

To conform is accept the existent. Inconform is to want change the existent. The limitations and dependencies forces to conform with a series of conditions that for more than we want to modify we don´t have the ability to do it.

We can conform voluntarily or by force. If we have the ability to choose or not. To conform is synonymous with sufficient, to agree.. Not be conform has n implicit fund of improvement, otherwise we would be conform.

We must conform with the individual supervision that everyone has for the purpose of fulfilling our individual function in the collective according to the abilities, to the corrections to amend in the place, time, relations and particular circumstances. But we must be not conform in accomodate to a simple go making  it prevent us from evolve.

We can conform in material questions if we have the necessary that report a certain quality. On the other hand, we always long for a constant, spiritual development, because this is where the root of everything.

In the limited and transitory we must conform we like it or not, to accept that it is not in our hands model the stage, actors and the durability.

Is in the unlimited and eternal where we have to be non conformed, in intangible goods which are the basis of support where ideas, thoughts and desires born, that we later channel into actions in the surrounding environment.

The more we increase the consciousness level, the more we will know the optimal measures where we hve to conform and where no. The training is constant, having to fit us to the changes to increase or dicrease the inclination in one way or another depending on how the results are produced.

To mantain or change. Caution or risk. Stagnate or progress. These dilemmas will always be present, and we will have to decide where we stand up.

INFINITESIMAL WASTE

What is left of what happended during the day ?  What is left of the week, of the month, of the year ?

Does anyone remember significant facts of a decade ago ? of all the actions, of all the experiences, what percentage have we been able to take advantage of for a continuity ?

Over the years we can know dozens or hundreds of people. Of these how many have been significant ? How many have they inspired us ? Surely the majority were insubstantial as usual it´s going to be doing routines because is the custom.

What do we remember about what we did a year ago, three or five ago ? How many days have we vibrated, have we got excited ? 

The desire is to live exciting experiences, but the truth is the obligations limit us for the dependencies of resources, and without high ideals that they print another vision, a different approach and other posibilities, the day to day is reduced to work, eat, have the house in conditions and rest. And so the days and years go on, pending for subsistence we don´t overlook the cause of existence.

People need set goals, but these must go beyond nurture and physical desires. If we live just to have we can not discover our particular specifity in the collective. Decode the function of relationships with which we have to teach and learn reciprocally immersed in the immensity and having only small knowledge. With great development potential, we take advantage of the minimum of the minimum.

What have we retained from the study as a permanent knowledge ?

In all areas, the background content is reduced to infinitesimal portions. After listen a lecture remember only a tiny percentage. Of daily food take advantage of the synthesis and eliminate the useless. From work, several activities, of a conversation, in the end everything is compressed like a capsule.

In front of this evidence we should rethink ourselves in what we invest time and effort, because in what must be edifying  there is almost nothing left, trivial occupations derive directly from the embezzlement.

ERRORS FOR A PROFIT

What is an error from our limited point of view ?  A mismatch. Put or do what does not correspond. The obstruction, what does not fit it indicates that at some point in the way the required mechanisms are not being coupled to achieve the proper functioning of the claim.

There are no errors in the universe, simply cause and effect. Nobody wants to err on purpose, What we don´t know is whether the "supposed error " was indispensable to force us to observe, reflect, rethink objectives, see where you can improve and correct. because in the end the purpose of the errors is to lead to the right.

What can cause mistakes ? The lack of attention, neglect, impulsiveness, ineptitude, not have enough information. What does not fit appropriately is not knowing to combine several factors, where the goal of a purpose is some kind of benefit or satisfaction.

The concept of error does not frame in machinery only, also in the behavior, in the relations. The intent of desires channeled into actions it´s getting an amazing outcome, and if in the end is not like that, or the process still has to cover stages, or there is not harmony between subject and object.

Error is synonymous of lack which must be covered with the relevant one in each case. Replace the inappropiate one for what is harmonic.

Error is disconnection. Success is connection. Everything that generates chaos, conflict, tension, suffering, has the origin in some wrong movements. When generates wellness, abundance, health, peace, is an obvious sign of coupling between an initial thought and a final result.

The universe constantly warns us of the revolt of the elements the dangers that we are forging with our actions. Are opportunities to stop us, amd measure pros and cons, to learn from the experiences and correct. The alarm signal should be taken advantage of to convert the so-called error in a bigger benefit that it would not have been possible of not having commited certain actions and triggers first.

When the error ends up turning the background context in something better, has fulfilled its purpose.

KNOW HOW TO LET GO ( II )

If the events are leaving the archive on a daily basis ¿ Why do we want to take some contexts that have already made their service ? ¿ Why do we want to turn the transient into eternal ?

The subject to duality is transient. Eternal is part of the unit. What can you see, weigh and mesure is subject to fluctuations. The intangible can not be see and measure, but always can access in form of inspirations, virtues and expressions that manifest sensibility and intelligence.

We are here to learn about the envioronment, and if the conditions changing constantly, pretend not to change is like to want stop the water that flows into the river.

How is fear forged of think that the different that can come may be worst or deteriorate the existent ?

If the kept it up asks for a transformation, preserving it will lead in a progressive degradation for not act when the situation he required it.

The experiences and its result, indicates if is necessary some adjustment or not, what preserve or what leave. The one who has already done its service is a referent, and from here we can build new contexts in the same manner that we coupled the day to day and the change of seasons.

The crowd of all kinds of conflicts that accompany us dairy, have the origin in no want to let go. Economic interests, boast power, always falling in the same groups, in those who are weak because don´t have enough strong to fight against the arsenal of resources that the leaders have. The strong of a minority with huge tentacles, it imposes a defenseless majority which is exploited to satisfy the voracity of those who control and made a measure the one that suits. And even if it envolves confrontations and constant tensions, while they are imposing they do not plan to drop miserable profits by how much they can be.

KNOW HOW TO LET GO ( I )

Subject to factor time is not possible to stop it. We can not escape of the conditioners that surround us where the machines allow repetitions, revisions, but us only can project only forward.

From this evidence, pretend to freeze or perpetuate situations is go counter current. Each fact, each episode is unique, by similarity that exists between certain experiences, there is always some difference, and therefore is absurd to want to remain anchored in a context that is always changing.

From children we have passed to young people from the student to the working age, it is inevitable and inescapable, and in the same manner that we accept it because it can not be otherwise we also have to get rid of it of everything that has already done its process and its specific contribution.

Why do people cling to a charge ? To a couple ? To certain material goods ? Why some countries maintain obsolete structures, that instead of progress lead to moral and economic poverty ?

Activities and hobbies of a past they stop meaning and importance when we expand perspectives. Related relations of an age they are no longer when the path of growth diverges among the members.

Tools of use maintained maybe for decades, they comer when a substitute offers better benefits.

Really those people who don´t want changes want to petrify themselves ? Life is movement, if there is not movement there is not change, and if there is not change  why do we want to perpetuate ourselves ?

Fear to the unknown, comfort, keep privileges, it indicates cowardice and poverty of spirit, because every day is new and we don´t know where it will take us.

To want to know more, act better, generate more satisfactory conditions, that´s we must yearn for. And if we are not moving forward in this direction we will go backwards. Is this what these conservatives want ?

Knowing to let go is to flow naturally. Those who commit to retain are collapsed because it goes in reverse direction, and to preserve selfish interests other things get worse by not accepting new trends, new manners they must be implanted to evolve, and so it can be done intelligently, because if it is done with idiocy we will know when the complications will begin but not when will end.

BETWEEN DRINKING AND DRINKING

Between drinking and drinking it becomes the plot of everything we do and experience. Each new day we put the marker to zero that we have to fill it with activities that will make us consume time, money and foods with the aim of continuing our earthly presence.

Everything revolves around having resources, the key to establish an autonomy of movements and freedom of choice and possibilities in our pretensions.

The dependence of others and the nature is the driving force to dynamize the aptitudes to be able to carry out approppriate exchanges aimed at covering shortcomings.

We acquire skills through study and actions for the organization and function of the daily events. It´s about having the necessary to face the day, where everything immerses us in a wheel of constant consumption. Only need to see the advertisements where every purpose is to attract buyers, therefore to consume.

At this fantic pace from one place to another, from one activitie to another, to send or receive messages ¿ anyone is asking about what are we doing, what profit do we extract, and all that what is really useful ?

When we get to retirement, of all kinds of consumptions ¿ what percentage will we take advantage of to be better people, more intelligents, more sensitive, kinder, considered, generous ?

The limitations, needs to be covered, the widespread unconsciousness leads to living by inertia.

Everyone is agree to preserve the physical continuity, but if we unknown who are we, the social contributions to be transmitted, if evident evolutionary improvements are not observed in our expressions, is a consumption by consumption, and when something is to do for to do it becomes an absurdity.

We want quantity but there is not quality. If each new day we don´t use it to fix new seeds of development and progress, we are misappropriating time and effort because we are not going  where we are supposed to go : to a constant expansion of knowledge and refinement in all senses.

WHAT WE OFFER

What comes out of us is what we offer. The stored in the inner is the latent, which can be both constructive and destructive, favorable or unfavorable, and we will know it as we show ourselves and its impact.

We are product of multiple influences, of constant exchanges, and what we are offering through words and facts, is a compendium of received and processed through thoughts and feelings.

Sometimes we can be kind, friendly, and others not. With some will be related and divergent with others.

The tuning or discrepancy it will influence in the expressions. In comfort or discomfort, and so while we can feel inspired according to whom, we also can experience the emptiness according to the environment and the captured by the sensory devices.

If we want the best in the interactions we have to install first in us. We can not pretend that others be impeccable and we transgress laws, regulations and norms of coexistence.

What we offer is product of the intelligence or its lack. Of the sensitivity or insensitivity. We just have to look at the environment to decrypt where the balance goes

To offer the best virtues must be acquired, which facilitate the acquisition of resources, and between the purpose and the tools, contribute quality by sharing it between giving and receiving.

The personal idiosyncrasy, the one of the countries, show us how they are in accordance with the expressions and what they generate.

All must be for the best, is the purpose of creation. If we assist to chaos, disorder and endless conflicts, it´s because there is not the ability to see the connections between emissions and receptions between each other.

The obnubilation of the material deviates from the path of righteousness, and pursuing insignificant gains we can not access to immense benefits.

The footprint of what we leave with its consequences is our letter of presentation. ¿We want offer wellness or discomfort ? ¿ Generate prosperity or adversity ? ¿ What we offer today we have to offer it tomorroy or should it change ? We are responsible for what happens at every moment. Going towards progress or degradation requires 100% consecration.

FORMALITY

Formalitat is that everyone desires, but assiduously is not present if the conduct don´t adjust to the canons of good manners between each other.

Formality implies the behavior, that through words and actions must find the right fit of the personal pretensions and of the interlocutors.

Each relation is different. With some there will be more afinity, with other less, and also those that will be impossible for background divergences.In any case the intent to show itself correct must prevail always, because we have to guard by the order and the harmony; otherwise it is chaos and discord what will prevail, and this always leads to losses.

Get out of us approaching to our neighbor to carry out exchanges requires consideration and respect. The treatment we want to receive is what we have to give.

Only we can offer, what we have learned, internalized, the aptitudes, and this means don´t exercise domination or abusing for what we have, because the personal goods they are only the means of individual expression to contribute to society through offers and demands that facilitate cover deficits.

To show us formal we must acquire a global maturity. Be organized in the tasks to be carried out, accomplish commitments, prepared and responsible.

Consider and respect others it means sticking to the pacts, promises, being puntual in the meetings. Repeat I´ll write to you, I´ll call, we´ll stay, and then after weeks or months everything has remained in empty words of content, it´s a saying to say to stay well that in fact is indifference and informality.

Postpone meetings repeteadly with excuses of bad payer or because they consider us secondary or expendable apart from the disinterest is an egoistic example of the posponer that is not responsible nor confronts with sincerity what don´t want to do, and avoid with evasives.

If so many things go bad, if so many relations are a disaster, is the predominance of darkness over light, of ignorance over knowledge, of inconscience over conscience. Only exchanging this order we can substitute the informality by formality  with the integral benefit that it must represent for all.