THE REFLECTION OF WHO WE ARE

Nothing of what surrounds us now has appeared without a reason. There is an origin, a first moment that it will forge next a new situation in the short or long term, small or large. According to the seed will be the fruit, and the natural evidence it is exactly the same in mankind. With the unconsciousness on the one hand, the personal desires of another, and not to foresee the consequences of some pretensions, is configuring the environment. The reflection on the outside is a product of the accumulated of the incidence or impact caused, and of the skill or clumsiness of the actions committed. Each one is unique and has a particular function, but that uniqueness it is forged by the influences received of interactions, of the cultural sphere and of the distinctive stamp itself who is in charge of sifting everything. We find all kinds of combinations in the social sphere : people with a natural goodness and others inclined to evil. Workers or lazy. Who watches over others with empathy, and the one who disregards. Smart and short prawns. The manifested, the externally evidenced, it emerges from within, and we can only express what we know and what we have. Why are there so many chaotic episodes ? Why don´t we learn from history ? Why we don´t know how to solve the simplest ? Why seeking comfort generates discomfort ? What is the use of so much technology and so many tools at our disposal, while milions of people go hungry, other have to move to find more comfortable situations, refugees, persecuted minorities, endless wars, pollution, unemployment, and more other questions it keeps the majority of the population in a precarious context. The day to day and what happens is a reflection of who we are. And if poverty prevails more than wealth, it is because deep down, we humans, we are more poor than rich. Poor by ignorant, for not knowing how to see in perspective the implications of our pretensions, to think in selfish terms instead of looking for the whole. And material rich are also poor if neglected and they do not help to alleviate the disorder that accompanies us, because it is not these transient goods that must be accumulated.

SOCIAL PRIMITIVISM

There is no day that execrable facts occur. ¿ What motivates people to behave in this primary way ? When not one thing another. The different ones are not supported, either by ideology, by sexual orientation, because they go in the opposite direction to personal interests. ¿ And how do you proceed in the face of the anger it generates in some ? Attacking in diferent ways. Men who instead of debating with simplicity the differences and try to find links of union and understanding, they choose to beat and kill women who are not shown as they wish. Attack someone completely unfounded for not having the sexual inclination they want to impose by force this gang of justices. Generalized lynching when atttudes, expressions, habitual tendencies are questioned. Band closure to follow the usual guidelines before listening and reflecting on different ways healthier and more beneficial individually and collectively such as food. It is not surprising that we have to experience what we experience, and the most instead of stopping to think what message is behind it and what we need to modify and improve to replace health and economic problems for welfare and wealth, only revelry are pending, and fill the drawer with money. Normality is not what is was before because it ws lived precariously in multiple sectors. And all this incivility, rudeness, intolerance, agression, criminal acts, they are committed by those who believe they are normal. And if before and now we are as we are, it is precisely because there is too much mismatch between what is wanted and what can be, between what is right and what is not, and if we don´t know to distinguish differences proceeding istinctively, this primitivism cannot become civility.

HUMILIATING AND HUMILIATED

The great humiliators of all times justly all they know to do is humiliate any dissident who does not think like them, that doesn´t say what they want to hear and doesn´t do what they want they feel humiliated when someone expresses the opposite, when events go against them, and when all efforts to have subjugated and controlled his opponents get out of hands. They that go in the opposite direction in the highway, where it is always the others who are wrong and they are always right. Those who consider themselves omnipotent, the best, where no one is allowed to question them because they are infallible, accompanied only by all those equally foolish and alienated from the slightest common sense, at the moment that the sensible analyze, reflect, and issue coherence based verdicts, then anger,rage, pride, all the weaknesses of the ego they give way to a huge fire where the water is unable to turn off. Viscerality is instinctive, animal, and if it prevails it is impossible for the person to be able to discern, of being equanimous or behaving civically. Those who have been oppressing for centuries, who have acted ruthlessly wherever they have been, replacing indigenous cultures to impose theirs, always despising, insulting, assaulting in many ways anyone who is not one of his, all they know to do is get angry, gesture, shout whenever trilerism and perversion do not bring them what they desire. As said the King David : " you have eyes but don´see. You have ears but you can not hear " Blinded by not wanting to see what one does not want to see and deaf to not listening what they don´t want to hear. And so to spend years, decades, centuries, for not solve the bottom of the conflicts so that retaining the miserable gains, that is the key of the question, serves as a free bar to apply all the dirt imaginable and unimaginable.

KNOW HOW TO MEASURE

In the day to day we have to measure different elements for various components to perform their function fulfiling a purpose. To find the optimal point in each case we need some measures, and with a knowledge of case to know what needs to be added or removed, along with relevant resources, we are carrying out operations to increase or decreasse in search of harmony in the whole. We can only measure the visible and tangible, in the three dimensions of time, space and movement. Operations take place in a limited context, because the invisible and limitless are not measurable. The mathematical operations are in charge of the calculation to sometimes locate a weight, size, distance or time, the precise information that facilitates our action for each area adjusts it in the best way to the most suitable for its function and benefits. Success or failure is a matter of numbers, debating between minimums and maximums, with what we have and know in the medium of action we must adjust the factors that come into play precisely to obtain the intended result. To get the measure right requires attention and concentration, as well as the tuned senses. Achieve the fit of diversity for a unitary purpose. Between us and the instruments that come into play and the goal that is pursued. The physical aspects can be measured, but no emotional or mental ones. When we say that someone is very smart is a subjective appreciation that we cannot see, weigh or touch, and is it to see the supposed intelligence in which such a person expresses or does. And the same when someone say " i love you so much " is the same as the previous one. Where does the " much " lie with what parameters and comparisons is it based on ? Or " i am very tired " how can you tell if it is a lot or a little ? with respect to whom ?. Well being or discomfort, understanding or disagreement, harmony or chaos, it tells us if we know to properly fix the measures or not, which depend on correct thoughts, feelings and actions in balance between all of them

INTOLERANCE AND IMPOSITION ( II )

Intolerance implies imposition " this no, that yes ". Behaviors or situations categorized as incorrect they must be neutralized by measures that counteract it. Incivility is fought with civility, aggressions with respect. Expressions considered inappropriate are not tolerated ¿ but what are these really ? If in a given culture the same acts are not punishable and in other parts they deserve punisment ¿ who measures and who is right in the assessments ' There are impartial intolerant and partial intolerant. Those who are equanimous in the face of similar events sticking to some principles. And the partials that are tough on opponents or about what don´t like, and on the other hand if theirs do then they are condescending and it doesn´t matter. There are two types on intolerant and two types om impostors, intolerant driven by selfish interests or desires, not to claim the just suitable or convenient, rejecting anything that jeopardizes their claims. And the intolerant who moves thinking about the whole and the adverse consequences depending on what acts, and to combat it it needs decrees, laws and regulations. Who measures what is tolerable that what is not ? At what point are the boundaries crossed ? How can we know if the diagnosis is correct ? Is intolerable means " this can not be, can not be done " it is to be assumed by the consequences and the impact. What exactly is wrong ? the background, the shapes, both ? what is the retort of the intolerant ? what do they offer ? Impose what we want according to subjective values or ideas, if it leads to contempt, humililiation, invading the land of others, this can not be tolerated, is intolerable. The dictator we carry inside repel what is far from our tastes, crieria and values. However, it is one thing to dislike and another not tolerate. Between acceptance and non acceptance it implies greater factors of rejection of what is manifested. One would no longer have to be intolerant if everyone made sure to be right, nor would impositions be required when each behaved neatly. Both intolerance and imposition they may arise from primitivism or civility. Observing the posture and the result we will know if it inclines in one or in the other direction.

INTOLERANCE AND IMPOSITION ( I )

What is not tolerated ? What is said or how is it said ? What is done or how is it done ? What highlights our mistakes, inaccuracies ? What is the underlying reason for feeling so offended ? And the retort of not accepting what is said or done, is imposing another way of saying and doing. What we say or do is absolute truth, absolute justice, what is really right ? Behind these manifestations are too many egoic influxes and much mediocrity of believing it untouchable. Day by day we witness these nonsense. Of insignificant comments originate wildfires. Of a simple protest the dissidents must be severely punished. What does not sound good to the ear must be removed, covered or punished.Then those who only think of censoring speak of freedom, by oppressing, liquidating, so that only his dictatorial desire reigns to say and do whatever they want, but opponents must be suppressed. How do conflicts originate ? By the dispute between two discordant parties deffending different interests where the strongest want to make the weakest give up so that their ideological and power claims are imposed by force. And so the years pass. So much for filling your mouth with good intentions or pronounce the word democracy when the facts show the rudeness of the methods in search of unworthy objectives. And the reasonable citizen until when we must continue to tolerate brutality, indecency, the unjust justice and the gang of conjurers who govern ? Perhaps we organize ourselves and let the abused be the ones who impose the canons of conduct that truly sould reign.

WHY DO WE WANT WHAT WE WANT ( II )

What do we want and what should we want ? Does the impulse come from inferior or refined nature ? Will the beloved leads us to what we need ? With very limited knowledge, disconnected from the root of our idiosyncrasy and pending to decipher the why of situations, relationships and circumstances for its purpose ¿ how many of us truly know what to ask for and be more appropriate according to the individual peculiarities and goals to achieve ? We want what is external to us, for if we have it internalized we don´t ask for it. According to the longed for will be to internalize it temporarily or projected indefinitely. Preserving or achieving what we don´t have involves some kind of exchange, an effort where we have to offer or give something in return. If they are transient things or small quantity decisions can be made quickly. In large scale investments or in acquiring long term commitments, we will have to weigh pros and cons extensively for the consequences and the possible incidence in different sections. Everyone depends on the essentials, and the particular conditions of each one with room for maneuver, the individual function to be performed and the claims to be set through time, it will make us want some things or others. There will be things that will accompany us briefly, others a season, others perhaps decades, and only a few constantly. It will all depend on the service and the fulfillment of the purpose, whether it is a context, objects or relationships, pointing out that we don´t have to cling to anything because it may disappear whether we like it or not. Accumulate days is established in DNA. Most don´t ask why and to do what, and we must want to raise the bar of nonconformism in order to not susbsit and enough. Find out in depth the goal of weight and value of why we are the way we are and what we must carry out that gives meaning and benefit to experiences and efforts. Linking constant beginnings and endings, one routine after another it must be much more than covering files and keeping us going, amd what we should want is to illuminate what is behind it of what we do and see endowing the existence of meaning.

WHY DO WE WANT WHAT WE WANT ? ( I )

Wanting requires appreciation. Without appreciation there is not desire, and if we don´t give value or even rejection, prevents wanting. Wanting is the key that set us in motion, wheter by own will,need or obligation. We want what nourishes us : food, resources, knowledge, affections. And also other elements that are not indispensable but desirable. Wanting involves selecting and choosing according the possibilities, tastes and desires. Wanting contains several phases : maintain or increases the existing one, eliminate some of what we have or get the unavailable now. We want quantity and that it contains quality, and being able to access these depends on current evolutionary circumstances of each one to have mental clarity and fundamental resources to carry out the approach and appropriate actions to facilitate it. We must want optimal material conditions to execute the individual function according to the place we occupy and the social contributions to perform. And on the journey discover the potential and shortcomings to find the intended purpose of goals that go beyond the apparent. To want is to add or multiply in what we intend, and subtract and divide in what we want remove. We have to see clearly if what we want suit us, otherwise we will be embezzling resources that should be invested in the profit. A bad investment instead of entailing gains become losses. We want things for us o for give it to someone. For personal use or external items, and before to decide the acquisiton by investing time or money, observe the purpose and practical application. Wanting implies quantity with the exception of the intangible ones which cannot be measured such as silence, peace or tranquility. The quality of the quantity that is measurable depends on the materials, its precise treatment and location for the intended useful service. We want immediate things,in the short medium or long term. We want prolong well being and reduce the discomfort. We want health,good conditions, and getting anything there is always an exchange between that we can offer and the goal to achieve, and the better eqquiped we are in every way best benefits we can get.

TO FIT OR NOT FIT

The proper functioning of what surround us it´s a matter of fit. Several individualities with the respective singularities and contributions, need the support of other individuals, where the resources and shortcomings of each other to carry out exchanges that supply the desired, if they fit together, the purpose of the established links is achieved. To fit is from duality, 1+1. Externalization pushes us to be linked by dependencies, and in a constant offers and demand on a personal and commercial level the ideal coupling must occur in each context. Surrounded by animated and inanimated objects, of people and animals, all have a function and benefits, trying to relate to us in a timely manner for profit and harmony. Subject and object conveniently coupled is the milestone to pursue at all times. Between sender and receiver, give and receive, there must be a nexus that allow the proper connection, because the bonds pursue some kind of fit; otherwise the links are useless. We fit with others through tastes, ideals,specific affinites, feelings, goals. If it is the opposite we will not be able to fit. Tastes, ideas, different trends, it will be difficult to fit if there is no point to unclog it. We can fit by equality or similarity, and also by differences when each party provides what the other needs as a complement. We feel comfortable with who we fit into one or more points according to our idiosyncrasy, and especially the way we think and value what we have. And on the opposite side when others differ discomfort immediately arises. This is due to the egoic forms of reaction. We may dislike it and disagree with the exposures and/or manners of someone, but the opportunities to extract messages and profit it can come from both what is pleasing and unpleasant to us. The fit on an epoch with friendhips and couples, when the paths diverge, proximity becomes distance, and passes to the non fit, indicating that the fit must be continuosly monitored. In one way or another we all look for the right way to adjust us, because discord is what does not adjust, and therefore does not serve. Reach an agreement between the parties that intervenes, know how to behave, make a fair deal, these and other factors they must lead to fit , because if we are not skilled by proceeding properly, the result will lead to non fit.

DIALECTICAL BOREDOM

Much ignoraance and little knowledge is the prominent tonic. The majority interests are personal and material. Vision and focus arise from limitation and are superficial. In the face of this evidence, what communication can emerge ? Reiterative arguments, always wandering in routine matters, what final profit are we able to extract ? Where everyone is, interests, the concerns, certain inclinations, the ability to understand, values, is what we show in conversations, and if we stopped at one point and didn´t move, the only thing we do and keep doing is going around to the same subjects that do not contribute novelties nor a broader perspective to break inertia. In an encounter catching up requires a few minutes, the posterior extension with insubstantial banalities is to add filling comments and empty the backgrounbd chatter of content. We can only give what we have, and listening everyday a lot of linked words to say nothing neither provide reflections nor useful learning, it simply reveals the very long pending path of development that is indispensable to realize to consider ourselves evolutinarily advanced. Global limitation keeps us in this society of constant conflicts with the consequent relationship problems. The years go by and the utensils of daily use change, more comfortables, with more benefits, and instead of applying it as well in our behavior improving the precise areas, we continue with the multiple expressions that lead to discord. As a result of not knowing how to behave, the retort are demonstrations, strikes, demands. It has ever been able to succeed if it was unsustanaible to preserve the existing, without a force to impose, succumbing to the minority of power but with the executing force. As well as useless repetitive speeches, the same form of vindication in actions which mantain the prevailing immobility, should think about a change of strategy, a different approach that overflow the status quo, because only with words and some threat, is not enough to demolish the armored wall of those who govern, and to make this possible is necessary to increase individual and collective wisdom, on the contrary, perpetuation of dialectical and also everyday boredom.