IN NAME OF

In the name of religion, country, family, the power established gives green light to issue all the decrees, laws and regulations destined to favor specific interests.

The excuse of a common good, of an interest that supposedly must unite, open a way where it can fit the imaginable and unimaginable, always with an interested interpretation, arbitrary and partisan.

These " supposed saviors " who are believed to be authorized to impart and impose its doctrine, they did more harm than good. From dogmatic positions they value their ideas exacerbating, amd in the same proportion despise those who oppose it; because they of course have the truth and the others are wrong.

How start a discussion ? No need answer because everyone knows it. If the conflicts persists is for the goose of domain, to impose, that implies one part against other. And until don´t internalize deeply that from the respective individualities must search the collaboration and understood to create bridges there will no be peace.

All evil are born of selfish acts. For me but not for you. And this in name of purely interested must be converted in name of real common good, and from here the imbalances and the constant dairy barbarities they can start to straighten out.

It doesn´t matter whatever means religious, familiar, patriotic, economic, the personal actions influence in the society, and this in us, therefore the most wise and profitable is think and act as a result of agreement to such evidence.

We don´t must proceed in name that I want or will if this suppose to harm or to mistreat others for our own profit. The actions they have to be considered and executed in name of the correct to every moment and circumstance with the aim to fit the diversity to end at a suitable ending for the different involved parties.

WHAT WE WANT TO SEE

Why we want to see the comfortable, the easy one, the one that fits my character, tastes and ideals ? What can we really see with clarity, with width ? Knowing is a question of wisdom,  and if we didn´t acquired, what we´ll see will be distorted. The worst of all is to believe to be  in the truth  and express the opposite in the exhibitions and actions.

One thing is to want and the other to power. No matter how much you want to see a certain context with sharpness, if we are not compatible for whatever reason, what you will see are suppositions or ficticious stories adapted to our idyosincrasy, capacity and interest.

When there is purity and good intentions, it´s more feasible  to see it clear. Confusion comes from impurities and bad intentions. If we want to see clear instead to manipulate, distort and lie to obtain some hypothetical benefits, what we have to do is be honest and find the right one in the situation.

As always selfishness and ignorance they are the triggers of conflicts, and if they are produced, it´s because we have not known proceed harmoniously.

When there is a dissonance, a mismatch, it´s the indicator that different ways must be introduced that allow to synchronize optimally the creators that come on stage.

To see clear is a question of lace, of meaures, of perspective, and if to our dairy environment there are so many caotic episodes is precisely for reductionist approaches, limiting the ability to see with broadness the consequences to do or not do according to what.

What we want to see ? which adjust to our wishes and criteria., what you can not do is cheat because it does not occur that we want. We are not here to get away with ours whatever it is.and be consented children.

The situations that are presented they are to expand perceptions, knowledge and readjust the precise one to continually build new better versions.

We must observe the individual and the alien, the near and distant, the interactions and the triggers, because see with clarity ask leave the plot itself and interest to determine the optimum in each case taking into account the equanimity and integrity to get it right the diagnosis.

LOSING OPPORTUNITIES ( II )

What is an opportunity ? A situation between what is not now but can report some benefit as we proceed and the result that happens.

The opportunities are between what we do or not, and sometimes will be better to act and others best to wait.

On the way between a start and an end how can we see where are  the opportunities ? Depending on what we want, the environment, the tools with we count and how to deploy a process with its connections.

We don´t know exactly when or how we can find new options, because everyone with their conditions, character and goals, can demonstrate the possibility or not of accessing to new purposes.

Of the multiple opportunities that are presented what proportion are we capable of making profitable ? This is personnel and never can know exactly what we have been able to make the most of and that it has vanished along the way.

What can be an opportunity ? Why ? What conditions require ? The answer can be as varied as singularity of everyone. The important for ones is indifferent for others.

Between the existing and potential to establish connections, the ability to relate is essential.

Busy at times with unproductive tasks, loose opportunities of new learnings and do instructional tasks.

Know how to say and do in the right measure and timing is basic in order to achieve the experiences with understanding, vision and action to concrete the improvement.

From the most insignificant may arise opportunities on conditions of laying the precise conditions so that all the auditors perform their function aimed at this end.

LOSING OPPORTUNITIES ( I )

Constantly all togheter without exception we are loosing opportunities to correct and improve in many areas to not be able to see, understand, and decipher the content of words and actions, the personals and the others.

Let´s go from one corner to another, from one activity to another, spending the day working or looking for it, and the remainig time occupy it in unproductive tasks for an expanding faculties aimed to create a more satisfying environment that the current one.

In a childized society, where you can not do the slightest observation or reflection to many people by bothering for the most insignificant, it´s impossible modify dissonant features. slaves of the ego that only wants praises and facilities the situations are presenting to learn and conscience, wasting them over and over again wanting to cover the bottom of the question.

Don´t like the tone, the words, that remains in evidence, but the anger don´t change nothing. Repeat obstructive forms it will continue to lead to obstructions, and the beams do not affect the transmitter they also affect the receiver.

Of the daily work how we make a profit the time ? Could we have done more ? Embezzle the free hours in insubstantial occupations ? Take advantage of the times available to study, create or do voluntary work ?

What we offer to build to our relationships ? What expansion do achieve in the different interactions ? Of all meetings with friends, couple and others, how many are enriching and many irreplaceable ?

Only can offer that we have. If the preparation is high the potential will be so, but if the potential is low, for much we want obtain something, will have to stick to the prevailing level.

We want quality or quantity ? Talk to talk or instruct ? Kill time or take advantage of it ? Empty content relations or with a purpose of growth ? These and much more questions we have keep doing ourselves to keep losing opportunities, or either transformingit into profits.

SLOWNESS RESOLUTIVE

Everyone wants a good performance which refers to each one in needs and pretensions. The exchanges must by synchronized : betweeen us and the tools of usual use with the service that offer, and the interactions with other persons with the respective contributions of background.

When something does not fit in the manner what should do, stop performing its function. The solution is fix it or replace it. This is valid in relation to machines and people. The day to day is a succession of connections with mechanical utensils and people. Technology is to serve us and the humans to serve them and also for us to be served in the respective dependencies.

We have to ensure the good functioning of what surround us, and if there is a breakdown, a deterioration, an accident, we must search solutions quickly. What can not be done it´s let it get caught up what is obstructed, from a clogged sink, going through broken devices or broken relationships.

Postponing the resolution of which need attention for hidden or obvious interests, for incompetence, for fear according to what subsequent consequences, to prefer the bad known to a worse hypothetical arisen from the imagination and a leak vision, for informality or by mediocrity that slow down the pace by delaying the solution. Many may be the reasons, and possibly in some many things which are kept in perpetual jamming

be a product of several aspects at the same time. When there is a problem between subject and object, between a person and another, between one position an another, between collectives, between states, if only we are pending of what affects the self to get triumphant out without considering to you, it´s evident that what has lead to the dilemma will not be resolved.
So many things are delayed indefinitely for the greed of the powerful, by the weakness of the mass before the force of stablishment, and also by the immaturity of good part of population that applauds enourage speeches letting themselves fool with all the perverse that is behind the curtain.
Until don´t learn to combine diversity with careful treatment where the aim is the search of harmony, there can never be definitive resolutions putting only patches.

TO MAINTAIN PRIVILEGES

To maintain some privileges until where can get there ? How many basic rules of respect and coexistence can be transgressed ? Until where can degrade the behavior ?  To defend selfish interests must be altered the peace and order ? To preserve a petty ends it´s worth it to degrade with unforgivable actions ? In search of unlawful profits on the way you lose much more. because when anger stirs up the soul leaves the body being unprotected. But is clear, who moves for these desires don´t have consciousness of this fact so the ignorance keeps him in blindness, hence the clumsy actions one after the other.

The more persevere in the hardness, in intransigence, more it gets dirty, and the bottom line problem grows, because is not the viscerality that solve the problems, but with intelligence.

They catch the world without iunderstanding that what we have it has been received from the cosmic order,and it may think that have the right to dominate and abuse, when realy it´s part of a plan. Obsessed with preserving goods, unable to see beyond the interested plot itself, they don´t realize that when the actions affect negatively others block the support. that is what they intend to do go in favor, actually sooner or later will go against it.

If we want to get some priivileges provided by a certain place or resources, they have to win by merit. Use all sort of  traps, dirty game for the benefit itself, harming those who act correctly, aside from corrupting the elementary norms of relationship, contaminate the environment both with words and harmful actions, and going in search of instinctive instant satisfaction, the devastating effects will be extended indefinitely until not changed the axural forms for the harmonic ones.

Selfishness and ignorance deviate from the straight path one time and another, and all the problems around always derive from these. Want privileges that not correspond to us is to go aganist the cosmic order, and not appreciating what was assigned to us wishing what belongs to others, in the end it will lose it, and will also be taken what it was yours. In search of some miserable ends, miss the opportunity to flow to refined ones.

BETWEEN WISDOM AND IDIOCY

In hebrew the word MELEJ means " king ", and if we change the order and write LEMEJ means " idiocy "

What do these differences express ? In the word MELEJ the letter MEM initial is associated to the head, indicating that the " king " before issuing an opinion reflect to see in perspective the situation and decide how to act with coherence, righteousness and justice.

The initial letter MEM is associated to the emotions. If someone before to think is left dragged for the emotional impact caused by some facts or words can not see the context clearly, and instead of a lucid reasoning manifest the instinctive aspect from that which is threatened.

Those who are under the influence of the letter MEM they do not pretend to win or impose themselves to the force, they want debate ideas, argue, exchange positions civilly in order to find alternatives that allow improve areas that need a transformation when it is confirmed that the current context don´t serves and keep the same not only does it take anywhere, but is degrading and worsening further the situation.

Those that are under the influence of the letter LAMED only focus on disqualifying any adversary that not say or do what they want. It´s a dreadful attitude constant of small child consented that must always do what he wants, and others exist to serve him in his whims.

While the MEM show good manners, argue, respect the differences, want pacific solutions and democratic, the LAMED devote to disqualify sistematically, making the most primary aspect appear, distorting and adapting everything to your liking in order to satisfy an insatiable desire to impose his will even suppose to step on rights and what is ahead.

The eternal struggle between civilitzation and barbarism, between wisdom and  foolishness, between knowledge and ignorance, between light and darkness, between those who want harmony and those to satisfy privileges achieved with violence, don´t hesitate to maintain the tension, the confrontation and the chaos, under the premise of miserable goals.

MADNESS NORMALIZED

Whatever it is the age through the history, we have always been immersed in some kind of madness, when not in one way or another, and for more social advances over the centuries, never disappears this clumsy behavior in the form of chaos, malaise and constant controversy.

In this context of Sodoma and Gomorra where the good is bad, and the bad is good, where the righteous pass throug unjust, and the unjust for just, where the innocents go to jail and the guilty are out, where the gangsters act with impunity restored in places of power, and those who should protect us become a danger, where to contradict the master exposes to a via crucis which can turn into a nightmare, it turns out that this is seconded for thousands of people that they find it totally normal and consider these dislocations they should still be bigger.

A madness that spreads progressively without stopping, where its creators they seem totally rude fresh to increase until getting ecstasy. Universiy people that they should manifest consistency and training, and when observe what they say and do you ask yourself it they have drunk the understanding.

The silly has arrived at that level, that a common delinquent beside him is an authentic aristocrat. Once lose the sanity is how to open the gate of a swamp, and it is no longer possible to return the water back, and takes everything forward with force.

The inept is the one who commands when should be backwards. The one who has talent is rooted, and the mediocre occupy positions for which is not ready. Honest people are observed with magnifying glass, and turn a blind eye with the offenders. The good ways are under suspicion, and aggressiveness is reward.

The executioners distort the facts becoming victims, and the real victims become guilty in order that the free bar does not have a breakdown. The mighty ones act as they want, and any citizen that does not combine with their postulates better prepare us in this context of abuse and permanent defiance.

DISQUALIFYING THEMSELVES

It´s funny to listen the statements of some people with a tough tone, angry, totally convinced of what they esposes as the only truth, where the rest represents that they are wrong, and they are the ones who are always right, always the best, they should never apologize, never admit errors despite multiple evidences being presented. Who do they want to convince ? They really believe what they say ? And if is so where is discernment, equanimity, the good sense ? What the rest of the world sees an outrage, they see it normal. Those who think differently should be redirected, while they have the right to all kinds of aberrant behaviors.

They disqualify those who don´t say and do what they want, because only they are convinced that theirs approaches and objectives are the valid and the only ones that count.

Disqualifying constantlly those that not belong " to yours " with arguments that are not held anywhere, in his blindness, they only cause them to disqualify themselves.

They ask every second that must be comply the law, and it turns out that they permanently violate it. They can make and undo everything they want, wherever they want and whenever they want; others can not even decide what they want or they would like to the house itself.

The absurd becomes a norm, and what should be normal it becomes utopia, where the delirium it grows steadily in more and more areas, but it´s clear, this is the more normal for they, with such to impose its will.

How can qualify someone who believes to be always right and the rest wrong ? They never have to apologize for more sawy than they commit. However, if someone says or does the slightest thing which they consider offensive they should retract immediately.

No more exhibitions, the same facts are clear that is correct and not, what is truth and what is lie, who is civilized and who does it as a madman.

THE TRIGGERS OF CONFLICTS

Where is the origin of conflicts ? In the expression of clumsy forms. Words or actions that instead to resolve dilemmas enquire these, instead to seek distension increase the confrontation, instead to alleviate the sittuation is getting worse.

What is the fund that causes this type of harmful conduct ? Selfish interests. Cling instintively to satisfy personal desires proceeding despoticly where everything goes with it in order to achieve some ends, passing over moral and ethical principles, where the adversary, the one who bothers, what is an obstacle, it should, be flushed, open the blade to commit all kinds of savagery and brutality of a range of indescribable consequences while impunity is normal and do not intervene external forces to stop it.

The lack of vision in perspective of those who let themselves drag for viscerality instead of reason, with arguments and pretensions  totally unpresentable, they show the low level in what they say and do. They believe they are smart with their strategies, when in reality is the opposite, being just a matter of time that the perverse plannings they end up turning against.

Clashes are always due at least one of the parts is short, bad or has power. And the worst is that someone has the three components together, then it´s a watch bomb.

Someone who is short does not discern with clarity, don´t see the context with amplitude, many details does not know how to distinguish them, for this reason is mistaken in the approach and in the attitude.

Someone who is bad, is fixed in your self satisfaction, and from there he only make mistakes they are getting dirty until the final fail.

Someone with power, if have a distorted view ot the environment, of facts, who wants to make use of the position to impose itself on the force, and there is also a bottom of internal evil. the crisis is served.

How to get out of the dead end ? Going to the opposite terms. From short to clever. From evil to kindness. From abusive power to respect for others whatever they may be the characteristics of these.