All our efforts go in search of quality. No one wants miserable conditions, and the desire for improvement drives us to overcome ourselves. And this so easy to understand it must be extended to conversations.
What happens in the day to day ? The same stereotypes that make the questions and answers are repeated. We follow the standard patterns, improvisation is lacking, turning the exchange of what is said into one more procedure.
Many words, a lot of repetitiveness and very little resolution. It could save the chatter that leads nowhere, and if this tendency prevails it is because one can only give what we one has.
What level is there in couple conversations ? Is there mutual enrichment, an expansion of horizons, a development of consciousness ? Or just go commenting on the day, any anecdotes and little else ? What real interest is there between brothers to know their concerns, how do they feel ? Do we have friendships that can be expressed sincerely, or do we prefere those that tell us what we like to hear ?
To go well the meetings must be synthetic, short-lived and spaced in time, so before the boredom arrives we will finished them.
Focus on the underlying topic, say the precise. More time and more words it means no more satisfaction, as in the drink.
In regular relationships is difficult to find attractive reasons for conversation if people know each other well and the margin for surprise is low.
What exciting news can be discussed from day to day in the family sphere ? What depth is there in what is spoken in a couple, between parents and children, between friends ?
How many words do we utter in a day, in a year ? How many were necessary and useful ? How many sterile ?
We talk too lightly, and instead of addressing unproductive cheater, we should try to endow ourselves with a quality global, because then we could convey it in conversations.
Do we want exchanges with essence or content gaps ?
No comments:
Post a Comment