TO DEFEND THE INDEFENSIBLE, TO CRITICIZE FOR THE SAKE OF CRITICIZING

That a limit vision prevails in the human race is evident. One only has to observe the nonsense that is said and done. Everyone believe they possess the truth, those who agree with certain forms and those who oppose them. The facts that shown clearly, would not give rise to doubt about whether is good or bad, right or wrong. The discrepancies between defenders and detractors are because there are interests or clearly a biased vision that prevents being equanimous.                                                                                You can´t defend the indefensible. When you transgress the laws of order, civility, commit crimes, destroy, invade foreign countries, harm others for personal gain, only someone cynical, insensitive and soul less can defend it.                                                                                                                                                  Criticizing for the sake of criticizing seems to be one of the favorite activities, not only of the usual politicians who never find any success in their opponent, while they are always impeccable. Now we must add the great understandings of the networks who seem professorial when their high level of shortcomings is obvious. Nothing edifying, everything is a reason for criticism. Too tall, too short, too fat, too thin, poorly dressed, and so on ad infinitum. ¿ What satisfaction do these comments bring ? ¿ Do they serve any purpose, especially to improve both the sender and receiver ? ¿ If not, why this anger, this disgust, for the simple fact that they don´t like certain things ? Are these talkers and writers absolutely perfect in every way ? Obviously not, starting with useless verbosity that doesn´t change anything and instead makes the environment dirty. What is said and what is done shows the level, and unfortunately, day to day, far from establishing harmony, only generates discord. 

TIME TO HAVE, TIME TO BE

We are because we have, we have because we are. They can not be separated because they represent the impulse and the manifestation. Being is the impulse from the invisible, and having is the seen in the visible of the abilities and resources. We want to be and we want to have, that the efforts have a goal beyond physical subsistence. Everyone is different and with their evolutionary level, but we all have to fight to cover deficiencies and dependencies. Not having in search of having is the engine of improvement forcing us to constant exchanges of supply and demand .Having must be useful, that it performs a service, and therefore we must ask ourselves : what do we want to have ? what do we want it for ? what use will make of it ? Society pushes us to have because of constant needs, and attending to these needs makes us not think about norishing the needs of being. Having is for external development, being for internal development, with the difference that having comes and goes, with ups and downs to finally leave everything behind. On the other hand, being is the eternal, unalterable values that always accompany us, giving meaning to the efforts and experiencies to improve our expressions.                                                  Immersed in the material, having to obtain various supplies, limited and conditioned by obligations to search for resources, one does not become conscious of intangible goods simply because they are too busy in the elemental where the majority has not internally forged the desire to live by spiritual guidelines and goals.                                                                                                                                                              Having must be a reflection of who we are. Predominate virtues or defects ? What emerges from within shows itself outwardly with its consequences, and it is up to us give it the appropriate direction and expressions if we want well being to prevail.                                                                                                Having must provide what is essential to have autonomy and access to quality, with the appropriate measures neither too much nor too little. Having is not the end, it is the intermediary between the internal and external, shaping talents in a fit between the personal and the collective.                                              First we focus on having to learn, offer services and have what we need. From maturity to old age, material interests diminish, because it is time to focus on individual cultivation with the true purpose beyond a worldly life and material goods.