Thera are two sides of criticism : with the goal to improve, or by one disagreement that brings to glisten shortcomings, inaccuracies, or by the contrast of desires and contrary ideals..
Criticism to an end uplifting should be done through expeience and careful discernment, with the purpose to correct actions replacing them by others more optimal. This happens mainly from parents to children or teachers to students, where the best preparation allow indicate more appropriate guidelines for a later profit.
Then there is the criticism according to their own points of view. If someone makes a gesture which does not fit with our singularity, is rejected with words that can be more or less hards.
The criticism involves judge of an attitude, facts, and in each case, must see the impact to check if the person who criticizes it does with foundation, or simply but not fit to personal code of values.
On what basis is criticized ? To an ideal of purity, harmony ? Who criticizes is perfect ? If the critizer is not enough correct, has no right that others do what he is unable to accomplish. We must be consistent, fair and equitable.
Before this, considering several inaccuracies that we show together, nobody should criticize. Besides, the purpose of our existence is able to see the function exerted by successive people that intersect along the way to learn what behavior we adopt in every area. Offen see things as provocation, rudeness or similar, is where must decrypt the message to a higher level of understanding. We are all intermediaries, and behind that we see " reproachable " a potential information is hiding to understand what happens and advance evolutionarily.
Everyone wants the correct, but according to the degree of consciousness and cultural influence, everyone will interpret in their own way, thus can be criticized the considered incorrect when in reality can be correct.
The egocentric approach, makes see the things according to our own desires, criticizing by interest, by acts or words, and disliked, showing in several occasions a children postures.
Show disagreement continuosly by the most insignificant, is the ascertainment of the prevailing low level, where all we get is tension without solving anything.
The criticism must be to improve, to advance, expand horizons; otherwise is useless, and in this case is better the silence.
No comments:
Post a Comment