Monday, 18 June 2012

ABOUT THE TOLERANCE ( II )

Many people make mistakes and does not support any indication, reflection or suggestion to modify the behavior. The pride and ego are bad advisers, bearing in mind that the ultimate goal of any committed is approaching to the maximum correction.
It seems as only the police or relevant authorities could warn them because exert a socially accepted role to establish order. Teachers, parents, in our childhood, can be a part of this group, the rest has to silence the evidence not to offend these irresponsible.
It is a question to clarify incorrect forms of those that do not support get exposed for their misdeeds, while serious people and efficient suffer directly the consequences of careless procedures lacking in coherence, consideration and attention.
Many people don´t give importance to the idleness, to unworthy treatment, where unfortunately is a common fact that really nitpicking even the more fighter. They know that are not correct, but they wouldn´t listen to the powerlessness to change the prevailing.
People have become accustomed to not answer messages, letters, or pay at the appropiate time, to name just a few examples.We are witnessing a bleak picture in that multitude of aspects don´t work because of  the mediocrity that does what it seems without taking into account the consequences or think about the neighbor.
We have to consent this accumulation of incompetence ? Not to react or take measures before the low quality of actions or inactions that harms a person who acts sleekely ?
We are in the personal assessments of each one before situations where some may consider annoying to make noises, give blows or other constraints, and others do not. In the face of uncertainty, a plus of consideration and respect for better living together is what has to been to seek.
It may not be that rude and inconsiderate will be upset  if we put them in evidence to correct, and those that receive the sloppy ways have to hang in and not complain.
This attittude disable the concord, because proceed with negligence, wanting the impunity and do not claim to be amended, leads directly to the ruin.
Everything that breaks the harmony, becomes soiled, it goes against the natural balance, injures, hurts, it was not to be tolerated. Is the order who must prevail not the chaos, the dignity and not the contrary. If we agree that these individuals getting off unharmed, is to accept the degradation as inevitable.
Where, when and how must begin and end the tolerance ?

No comments:

Post a Comment